Re: Looking for a global benchmark on knowledge transfer #knowledge-retention #knowledge-transfer
Murray Jennex
I agree with you Nick, but having them available for history is the key thing. I wouldn't rely on them to know how to do the job now, but to provide insight into what has worked and what didn't work and why. And of course this varies with the type of organization, engineering organizations (of all types) are more apt to benefit than say sales organizations. The risk is in not understanding the limitations of past knowledge and this is true be it retiree knowledge or captured knowledge....murray jennex -----Original Message-----
From: Nick Milton <nick.milton@...> To: main@SIKM.groups.io Sent: Wed, Jan 11, 2023 4:01 am Subject: Re: [SIKM] Looking for a global benchmark on knowledge transfer #knowledge-retention #knowledge-transfer There are three things that worry me about relying too much on retiree networks:
So the networks may work as a short term solution, but then become a risk
Nick Milton
Knoco Ltd From: main@SIKM.groups.io <main@SIKM.groups.io> On Behalf Of Robert M. Taylor via groups.io
Sent: 10 January 2023 23:08 To: main@SIKM.groups.io Subject: Re: [SIKM] Looking for a global benchmark on knowledge transfer #knowledge-retention #knowledge-transfer This was the famous case of Bob Buckman's Buckman Labs, wasn't it, from the early days of KM? The story that retirees were retained in the network?
|
|