Re: New Trends in Knowledge Management #hot-topics
Neil Olonoff
Birgit and all,
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
Lately I've been writing about the deficiencies (as I see them) of the "People, Process & Technology" framework. To me, it does not explain or support KM very well. First, PPT is so general and high level, you can use it to explain anything at all. Think about it; you could discuss the "people, process and technology" aspect of tiddly-winks. Second, it seems to me that almost all KM initiatives / programs partake almost equally of all three aspects. There's a people, process, & technology aspect to almost everything, to include: - content management - collaboration systems - communities - competencies improvement - change management - knowledge embedding in processes / workflows Since early KM doctrine use PPT, it's almost impossible to eradicate. I've noticed that people are very possessive of it and resistant to change. It's akin to a religious belief. I've started using a different framework specifically for KM Initiatives: Content, collaboration, Community, Competencies & Change Management. I also have a suspicion about PPT, and wonder if it's true: I suspect one of the early uses of it was by IT folks who were compensating for programs that failed due to inadequate attention to people and process, hence their insistence that they did, really and truly care about processes, and yes, by the way, people too! With that pedigree, if true, it's another reason we should seal PPT into its coffin and drive a stake in its heart. But do you agree, or violently disagree? What are your thoughts? Neil Olonoff
On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 11:00 AM, Gobi, Birgit (HP Technology Consulting Knowledge Management) <birgit.gobi@...> wrote:
|
|