On 6 Nov 2020, at 4:16 PM, Santhosh Shekar <santhoshshekar@...> wrote:

I have taken them from the comments, to represent different school of thoughts. I think I should have explicitly mentioned it.

Will highlight it in the website comments. Thanks for askng!! 

Regards,

Santhosh Shekar

On Fri, 6 Nov 2020, 10:27 am Patrick Lambe, <plambe@...> wrote:

Thanks Santhosh. Can you clarify if the 51 respondents who thought the standard was a “complete waste of time” comes from the sample of 191 respondents, or is a separate sample?

P

Patrick Lambe
Partner
Straits Knowledge

phone:  +65 98528511

web:  www.straitsknowledge.com
resources:  www.greenchameleon.com
knowledge mapping:  www.aithinsoftware.com

On 6 Nov 2020, at 2:09 PM, Santhosh Shekar <santhoshshekar@...> wrote:

Dear All,

Thank you very much for making the poll a good starting point of discussion around KM standards.

Many would have already seen the Poll Result report on realKM; thanks to @Bruce Boyes for getting it published. 

For those who have missed the report and to make this thread complete. Please find the link here.

https://realkm.com/2020/10/31/iso-30401-visibility-and-applicability-poll-report/

Thank you,

Santhosh Shekar 

On Wed, Oct 7, 2020 at 1:50 AM Aprill Allen <aprill@...> wrote:

Hi David,

Different people talk about knowledge management and aspects of it in different ways. The Standard aims to bring some common way of understanding, identifying and measuring whether an organisation is delivering against it, at least at a high level.

--

Aprill Allen Founder and Managing Director | Knowledge Bird Knowledge management consulting & KCS Trainer M: +61 400 101 961 knowledgebird.com

On Tue, Oct 6, 2020 at 9:55 PM David Eddy <deddy@...> wrote:

Santhosh -

>

> We need a common language

>

What is meant by this term, “common language?”

- DavidE

<SK18th_Anniv2020_emailfooter (2).jpg><SK18th_Anniv2020_emailfooter (2).jpg>