Re: Making SIKM Presentations More Widely Available #APQC
Stan,toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
It sounds like a win-win if you are able to maintain the leadership and control over the selection of presenters and the presentation timetable. I am assuming that the APQC will be profiled as the Sponsor and that circulation and intellectual property rights remain with the presenter. Expanding the audience to include APQC-related KM contacts would be beneficial.
Are you and HP comfortable with APQC involvement?
Have you received a time and budgetary commitment from the APQC (e.g., a trial period of three-months leading to a minimum of a one-year commitment of sponsorship and resources)?
Stan Garfield wrote: