It sounds like a win-win if you are able to maintain the leadership and
control over the selection of presenters and the presentation timetable.
I am assuming that the APQC will be profiled as the Sponsor and that
circulation and intellectual property rights remain with the presenter.
Expanding the audience to include APQC-related KM contacts would be
Are you and HP comfortable with APQC involvement?
Have you received a time and budgetary commitment from the APQC (e.g., a
trial period of three-months leading to a minimum of a one-year
commitment of sponsorship and resources)?
Stan Garfield wrote:
> APQC has offered to play a larger role in supporting the SIKM Leaders
> Community. This could include con call logistics, providing wider
> access to presentations, and providing a blog platform.
> Before agreeing to any of this, I wanted to ask the members for their
> views. If you agree, disagree, or have other suggestions on this topic,
> please reply to this thread. No decisions will be made without first
> notifying the members.