Re: Business Case for KM
#value
Aaron Buchsbaum
@Stephen – do you have any references / templates for RROI matrix calculators? Don’t know that I’ve ever heard of one (ROI yes, “RROI” not ringing a bell…)
Thank you! Aaron
|
|
Re: Business Case for KM
#value
James Lewis
I agree with Stephen. You need to articulate the "why" before the "how".
It may help to break it down into parts: * Here is our problem ... * The result of this problem is .... * We can solve for this problem by ... * The expected outcomes of this project are ... If you are really stuck, I'd suggest holding an hour-long "problem statement" workshop with your key stakeholders. It will help get down on paper what you are trying to do and has the side benefit of aligning various points of view. Get them to collectively agree to the following (sticky notes work great here): The problem of ... Affects ... The importance of which... A successful solution would ... If you do the problem statement workshop, spend a full hour and really press your stakeholders to dig deep. It's time well spent and can set direction for your project, as well as give you insight into scope and scale. Best, Jim Lewis Principal Consultant, KM & Collaboration Paragon (now part of CGI)
|
|
Re: Business Case for KM
#value
Stephen Bounds
Hi sry, Have you got a set of identified business problems that the KM project is, or is likely to, help to solve? And is the scope of the activities of the KM project well-known, or is that still speculative as well? You can use a RROI matrix calculator to show linkages between activities with diffuse benefits and business outcomes. This same activity prioritises your KM activities in the event that you have to operate within a constrained budget. Cheers, ==================================== Stephen Bounds Director & Principal Consultant knowquestion Pty Ltd E: sb@... M: 0401 829 096 ==================================== On 14/12/2017 6:46 AM, sry204@...
[sikmleaders] wrote:
|
|
Business Case for KM
#value
sry204@...
I am new to an organization who is looking at a potential KM Project in the upcoming year and have asked me to write a business case with only very broad direction that would help them evaluate whether it becomes an approved project. I am a little "stuck" given the magnitude of the initiative, any advice on getting a good start on the planning stage?
|
|
KM for today & Tomorrow - Presentation to University Graduates : Do you have any presentation
#state-of-KM
Team Later this week i will be making a presentation to "University Graduates (Engineering Discipline)" about "Need for Knowledge management for Today and Tomorrow". Ask to you : 1. If you have any content you have presented recently/found in public domain, could you please share the presentation to "vijayanand@...". - as part of the presenation wanted to share KM references, like URLs for Stans' nuggets and few others to university graduates.
These kind of university connects, probably would help more people to take KM profession in coming years :-) Thanks in advance for your pointers. Regards Vijay
|
|
BCG Job Openings
#jobs
Mark Zoeckler is looking for a Project Coordinator in Madrid, Spain and for rock stars for a new knowledge product team at The Boston Consulting Group (BCG), in Boston or Chicago, including: Please submit your interest via the links provided in the postings above.
|
|
Julie Langford
Hi Vijay, I am so sorry to hear of the reorg. That is most certainly never easy (we just went through a major overhaul this summer). I have reached out to an amazing colleague of mine who moved back to India this past summer to see if he might have any leads. Should he have any, I will most certainly share. Julie
On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 4:47 PM, 'Vijayanandam V.M.' vijayanand@... [sikmleaders] <sikmleaders@...> wrote:
--
Kindest Regards, Julie 303-888-0361
|
|
Dear all This is Vijay, working as Global Knowledge Management Head for Microfocus Professional Services. Due to changing business context our KM program is downsized significantly and employees were let go off with severance package. One of the roles impacted is mine. I am looking out for new role in Knowledge Management or Global Software Delivery from India or abroad. If you have any pointers please share the same to me. https://www.linkedin.com/in/vijayanand/ Brief about me Global Software Business Leader with 20+ years’ experience generating up to $100+ million revenue, and exceeded expectations in delivering profitability. Built and lead global, cross functional teams from 10 to 600+ distributed team members in Global Delivery. Lead enterprise wide change management programs for about 3000+ employees across Americas, Europe and Asia-Pacific. Specialized expertise in turning around struggling programs, and improving processes in Global delivery, Knowledge Management (KM), Delivery Excellence. Recognized for building award winning KM Function & thought leader in KM. Thanks a lot for your support, and appreciate the same. regards Vijay
|
|
The Kent State University (KSU) School of Information (the iSchool), nationally ranked in the Top 20 by U.S. News and World Report, seeks a senior level colleague for appointment
as distinguished Goodyear Professor in Knowledge Management. The appointment is endowed by generous support from the Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company. The position reports to the director of our collegial, dynamic and growing school, which is part of the larger
College of Communication and Information (CCI). CCI is unique in that it includes schools in communication studies, digital sciences, information, journalism and mass communication, and visual communication design. The iSchool offers four master's degrees
in health informatics, knowledge management, library and information science, and user experience design, as well as various related certificate programs. The iSchool also offers courses in a data science concentration in the School of Digital Sciences. iSchool
programs are offered primarily online and attract students from across the U.S. and internationally.
|
|
SENAME from Togo
#personal
Atsu Sename
Hello all, I'm Atsu SENAME from Togo. I'm knowledge manager at ETD (NGO) based at Lomé. Kind regards
|
|
November 2017 SIKM Call: Dan Ranta on Collaboration at GE
#collaboration
#monthly-call
TO: SIKM Leaders Community
Today we held our 147th monthly call. Here are the details: Thanks to Dan for presenting, to Catherine Shinners and Mary Abraham for live tweeting, and to the members who participated in the discussion. Please continue the discussion by replying to this thread.
|
|
KM proven practices for small to medium-sized businesses (SMB)
#survey
Katarina Wajda <katarina@...>
Hello KM Leaders, My company (Shelf) is conducting a knowledge management survey in order to learn about KM best practices for small to medium-sized businesses and organizations. We've learned that there is less data and insight specifically related to SMB's, and we hope to help close the knowledge gap. Here is the link: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/MRJG9SB. I would really appreciate it if you could take 3-5 minutes to complete our survey. The answers will be used to glean findings about best practices and the state of KM in SMB's. We are also offering $5 Starbucks eGift cards for those who complete the survey. Please let me know if you have any questions or feedback as you go through this quick survey. You can direct any additional comments to me via LinkedIn. I look forward to hearing from you soon! Katarina Wajda
|
|
November 2017 SIKM Call: Dan Ranta on Collaboration at GE
#collaboration
#monthly-call
This is a reminder of tomorrow's monthly call from 11 am to 12 noon EST.
Nov 21 SIKM Call: Dan Ranta: Collaboration at GE Slides https://www.slideshare.net/SIKM/collaboration-at-ge https://www.slideshare.net/SIKM/collaboration-at-ge For online chat, visit http://www.tchat.io/rooms/kmers http://www.tchat.io/rooms/kmers and sign in with your Twitter account, or use the #KMers hashtag in Twitter. SIKM Leaders Community Monthly Call When: Tuesday, November 21, 2017, 11:00 AM-12:00 PM Eastern Time Where: (712) 770-4035 passcode 178302 You can join online using your computer’s speakers and microphone at http://join.freeconferencecall.com/stangarfield http://join.freeconferencecall.com/stangarfield If you have problems connecting, see the options listed at the end of this post https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/sikmleaders/conversations/messages/5400 Occurs the third Tuesday of every month from 11:00 AM to 12:00 PM Eastern Time (USA) Community Site http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/sikmleaders/ http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/sikmleaders/ Slides http://www.slideshare.net/SIKM/favorites http://www.slideshare.net/SIKM/favorites Previous Calls (click the arrow next to Date): http://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/sikmleaders/database/1/records http://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/sikmleaders/database/1/records Future Calls (click the arrow next to Date): http://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/sikmleaders/database/2/records http://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/sikmleaders/database/2/records Calendar http://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/sikmleaders/events http://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/sikmleaders/events Dialin https://www.freeconferencecall.com/wall/stangarfield/#/ https://www.freeconferencecall.com/wall/stangarfield/#/ Dial-in Number: United States and Canada (712) 770-4035 Access Code: 178302 You can join online using your computer’s speakers and microphone at http://join.freeconferencecall.com/stangarfield http://join.freeconferencecall.com/stangarfield If you have problems connecting, see the options listed at the end of this post https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/sikmleaders/conversations/messages/5400. International Dial-in Numbers https://www.freeconferencecall.com/wall/stangarfield/#international Afghanistan +93 72 989 0503 Albania +355 4 454 1712 Algeria +213 98 221 05 03 Argentina +54 11 5031-9546 Australia +61 2 4783 7110 Austria +43 1 2650541 Bahrain +973 6500 9124 Belgium +32 9 324 29 21 Brazil +55 11 3042-5290 Bulgaria +359 2 495 1721 Cambodia +855 96 696 7883 Chile +56 2 3210 9944 Colombia +57 6 7334209 Costa Rica +506 4090 1334 Croatia+385 1 8000 131 Cyprus +357 77 788687 Czech Republic +420 225 852 083 Denmark +45 78 77 36 33 Dominican Republic +1 829-239-8014 Estonia +372 634 6274 Finland +358 9 74791032 France +33 7 55 51 17 45 Georgia +995 706 777 583 Germany +49 209 88294442 Guatemala +502 2458 1450 Hungary +36 1 999 0542 Iceland +354 539 0352 India +91 7400 130 503 India +91 172 519 9044 Ireland +353 1 907 9721 Israel +972 55-966-1103 Italy +39 06 8997 1654 Japan +81 3-5050-5114 Kenya +254 20 7653281 Kosovo +381 38 413923 Latvia +371 67 881 973 Lithuania +370 661 05790 Luxembourg +352 20 30 16 53 Malaysia +60 11-1146 0074 Mexico +52 899 274 8860 Netherlands +31 6 35205063 New Zealand +64 7-974 6530 Nigeria +234 1 440 5024 Norway +47 73 79 03 14 Pakistan +92 21 37132323 Panama +507 833-6910 Poland +48 22 116 85 63 Portugal +351 21 114 3163 Romania +40 31 780 7054 Russian Federation +7 812 383-96-23 Slovakia +421 2/333 252 03 Slovenia +386 1 828 08 74 South Africa +27 87 825 0172 South Korea +82 70-7737-3405 Spain +34 872 50 31 53 Sweden +46 8 124 109 76 Switzerland +41 44 595 90 43 Tanzania +255 41 120 1004 Turkey +90 212 988 1774 Ukraine+380 94 710 5941 United Kingdom +44 330 998 1261 United States +1 712-770-4035
|
|
Re: "Good Practice" KM Recognition
#motivation
Aaron Buchsbaum
Chris --- this is great!! Thank you for your points. Super helpful.
|
|
Re: "Good Practice" KM Recognition
#motivation
Chris Collison
Hi Aaron, It’s a good list – it spreads beyond the boundaries of KM, but that’s not a bad thing - it’s helpful to recognise the Knowledge contribution to Improvement, Social Reporting and Change Leadership.
I know some organisations place the emphasis (and recognition) more on behaviours – and celebrating where a particular barrier has been overcome. So by way of example, ConocoPhillips used to run with an annual award - the 4Gs awards – Give (proactively sharing), Grab (curiosity, asking, overcoming not-invented-here), Gather (curating, taking ownership for a theme), Guts (proactively talking about failure). Syngenta borrowed ad adapted this to make the TREE awards, (Transfer, Reuse, Embed, [share a difficult] Experience). I know Syngenta are still running with these awarding around 30 out every quarter via their communities of practice. So over 7 years now, they should be approaching nearly 1000 stories of positive KM behaviours. If you have a copy of the WBG’s ‘Gardeners Guide to Communities of Practice’, there’s a short piece about the Syngenta approach in there.
So I guess my learning here is, for long-term sustainability, align the recognition with the behaviours you want to amplify (rather than a specific initiative), and ensure that your recognition process is on from which stories can be harvested.
Hope this helps… Chris
@chris_collison +44 7841262900
From: <sikmleaders@...> on behalf of "Aaron F Buchsbaum abuchsbaum@... [sikmleaders]" <sikmleaders@...>
Hi all you wondering SIKM-ers!!
I was asked recently to do some good ‘ol thinkin’ on “good practice recognition in KM”. I generated a rough list, based on what I see in my institution that I appreciate as a KM Officer, and also based loosely on the concept of ‘Ba’ proposed by Japanese researchers Nonaka and Konno in 1998. (article here). And by “loosely”, I mean thinking through the idea of generating, sharing, evangelizing, and applying knowledge.
So --- here’s what I have! Curious about peoples’ reflections. From here I’d start to delve into details about what to look for in a “good practice” in each area, such that they can be identified and highlighted across the organization (globally dispersed, app. 18k employees & consultants).
(one area I might pull out in addition, is around application of new technology . . .)
Major Initiatives Already Knovember (+ Knowbel Awards) Big Data Challenge (+ report) Knowledge and Solutions Ideabook 3.0 Areas of Knowledge Work to Recognize 1. Creation of original research with operational impact Broad VP or unit applicability Niche technical advances "Innovative" or "creative" thinking outside usual frameworks 2. Peer Support --- Just-in-time / on-demand Peer-to-peer connections Knowledge sharing (resources, data, etc.) Inside Org Outside Org 3. Resource Sharing E.G. Colleague’s weekly safety net syntheses E.G. Colleague’s CoP webinars, newsletters, resource sharing 4. Social reporting E.G. Colleague’s – specific CoP activity summaries E.G. Colleague’s – social platform activity summaries 5. Business process improvement E.G. institution of Agile concepts Quality control 6. Championing E.G. Institutionalizing a new, effective idea/process
|
|
"Good Practice" KM Recognition
#motivation
Aaron Buchsbaum
Hi all you wondering SIKM-ers!!
I was asked recently to do some good ‘ol thinkin’ on “good practice recognition in KM”. I generated a rough list, based on what I see in my institution that I appreciate as a KM Officer, and also based loosely on the concept of ‘Ba’ proposed by Japanese researchers Nonaka and Konno in 1998. (article here). And by “loosely”, I mean thinking through the idea of generating, sharing, evangelizing, and applying knowledge.
So --- here’s what I have! Curious about peoples’ reflections. From here I’d start to delve into details about what to look for in a “good practice” in each area, such that they can be identified and highlighted across the organization (globally dispersed, app. 18k employees & consultants).
(one area I might pull out in addition, is around application of new technology . . .)
Major Initiatives Already Knovember (+ Knowbel Awards) Big Data Challenge (+ report) Knowledge and Solutions Ideabook 3.0
Areas of Knowledge Work to Recognize 1. Creation of original research with operational impact Broad VP or unit applicability Niche technical advances "Innovative" or "creative" thinking outside usual frameworks 2. Peer Support --- Just-in-time / on-demand Peer-to-peer connections Knowledge sharing (resources, data, etc.) Inside Org Outside Org 3. Resource Sharing E.G. Colleague’s weekly safety net syntheses E.G. Colleague’s CoP webinars, newsletters, resource sharing 4. Social reporting E.G. Colleague’s – specific CoP activity summaries E.G. Colleague’s – social platform activity summaries 5. Business process improvement E.G. institution of Agile concepts Quality control 6. Championing E.G. Institutionalizing a new, effective idea/process
|
|
Seeking a benchmark buddy for Knowledge Transfer
#knowledge-transfer
bamaster@...
Good day all,
It was great to meet many of you at KMWorld last week. I had a few fantastic chats about the topic of my presentation, Knowledge Transfer. I recall there was casual interest in benchmarking on KT programs.
I'm representing my company, Saudi Aramco here in the Middle East. I'm looking for another large organization that also has a KT program who would be interested in benchmarking with us. Our specific interests are in KT needs assessment, transfer approaches, and measurement. If you’d like to discuss about this more, please contact me directly at bernard.melendez@.... Thanks!
Tony Melendez
|
|
Stephen Bounds
Hi Soha, One other thought. Just on Friday I was talking to a Chief
Information Security Officer who was also lamenting the difficulty
of both determining and assigning the value of security activities
to particular service lines of their company. Since the work of security is in many ways quite analogous to that of KM (albeit couched as risk avoidance rather than productivity gains), I thought I would share their novel approach to dealing with the problem. They are developing a four stage process that goes like this:
This is easily adapted to a KM program evaluation. Just replace "security" with "KM" and "risk" with "benefit". Since hearing of this approach, I have been working on developing a method to apply this systematically to KM programs as a full-blown RROI calculator. I have so say it is showing some real promise. While there inevitably still some subjective judgements involved, it makes assumptions clearer and helps to meaningfully allocate KM benefits across an organisation. Happy to discuss further online or offline if this is of
interest. -- Stephen. ==================================== Stephen Bounds Director & Principal Consultant knowquestion Pty Ltd E: sb@... M: 0401 829 096 ==================================== On 12/11/2017 5:17 PM, soha radwan
soharadwan@... [sikmleaders] wrote:
|
|
Soha Radwan
Exactly!
From: "Murray Jennex murphjen@... [sikmleaders]" To: sikmleaders@... Sent: Sunday, 12 November 2017, 12:02 Subject: Re: [sikmleaders] Re: Calculating KM employees' productivity I hear you and agree! My main point is that it is up to us to demonstrate the value of KM in terms they will accept, not an easy job! -----Original Message-----
From: soha radwan soharadwan@... [sikmleaders] To: sikmleaders Sent: Sat, Nov 11, 2017 11:50 pm Subject: Re: [sikmleaders] Re: Calculating KM employees' productivity The Engineer Productivity model makes high sense, thanks a lot, it is really interesting. But as you know sometimes people in the HR doesn't want to change a specific method they use.
I like the way you put it, the way you instantly give options for measurement. This kind of flexibility is needed in today's work. May be the real struggle for KM/ innovation and other alike activities is derived mainly from rigid thinking in other parts (departments) of the organization. They don't always have the same rhythm.
From: "Murray Jennex murphjen@... [sikmleaders]" <sikmleaders@...> To: sikmleaders@... Sent: Sunday, 12 November 2017, 11:35 Subject: Re: [sikmleaders] Re: Calculating KM employe es' productivity you need some artifact to measure. If you look at the engineer productivity model I sent you can see that it included things like number of reports or analyses, drawing changes, etc. KM can be expected to make a knowledge worker more proficient in producing their work artifacts. Unfortunately, I don't know of any productivity model that HR will accept that does not include some discreet artifact that is produced and can be measured in some way. You could possibly use customer interactions and problem resolutions as measures, but I don't think you will be able to get away with using something like customer satisfaction. In all cases though to quantify using numbers of artifacts this will include some time measurement component, such as artifacts per hour or per day
-----Original Message-----
From: soha radwan soharadwan@... [sikmleaders] <sikmleaders@...> To: sikmleaders <sikmleaders@...> Sent: Sat, Nov 11, 2017 10:51 pm Subject: Re: [sikmleaders] Re: Calculating KM employees' productivity May be we will not be able to quantify it this way, given that we are currently developing new social activities that focus on increasing creativity and innovation (which relies on intensive quality attributes rather than quantifiable number of hours) . But may be we can think of new ways to ensure employees are doing their jobs and achieving their goals without sticking to 'number of hours' concept, and then link it to productivity (output/input)
From: "Murray Jennex murphjen@... [sikmleaders]" <sikmleaders@...> To: sikmleaders@... Sent: Sunday, 12 November 2017, 10:36 Subject: Re: [sikmleaders] Re: Calcula ting KM employees' productivity its done frequently and frankly, if you can't do it then you aren't likely to be able to quantify productivity, sorry.
-----Original Message-----
From: soha radwan soharadwan@... [sikmleaders] <sikmleaders@...> To: sikmleaders <sikmleaders@...> Sent: Sat, Nov 11, 2017 10:04 pm Subject: Re: [sikmleaders] Re: Calculating KM employees' productivity Thanks Murray, but it is somewhat challenging to assign average number of hours, especially for some new activities
From: "Murray Jennex murphjen@... [sikmleaders]" <sikmleaders@...> To: sikmleaders@... Sent: Thursday, 9 November 2017, 10:52 Subject: Re: [sikmleaders] Re: Calculating KM employees' productivity the simple solution might just be to do a job task analysis and then assign an average number of hours for each task, this is the basis for the individual productivity model I sent you, and HR was accepting of it as it was the best quantification effort they'd seen at that point....murray
-----Original Message-----
From: soha radwan soharadwan@... [sikmleaders] <sikmleaders@...> To: sikmleaders <sikmleaders@...> Sent: Wed, Nov 8, 2017 8:45 pm Subject: Re: [sikmleaders] Re: Calculating KM employees' productivity Thanks a lot Albert. And looking forward to knowing more about the framework you put.
Meanwhile I am still struggling to give the HR an exact number of hours per year for each KM activity, and struggling more in trying to convince them to at least go by work days not working hours. Honestly the point is not only about the calculation, but it is more about explaining the reason behind time taken in many activities which can not be " reducible into documentation" as you said it.
From: "Albert Simard albert.simard@... [sikmleaders]" <sikmleaders@...> To: "sikmleaders@yahoogrou ps.com" <sikmleaders@...> Sent: Wednesday, 8 November 2017, 19:05 Subject: [sikmleaders] Re: Calculating KM employees' productivity The challenge, as I see it, is that HR must be able to demonstrate that everyone is treated exactly the same and by the book. There are not inconsequential legal iplications for failing to do so. And the laws are sufficiently complicaged that it requires
specialists to know them. This, in turn, requires that everythiong that HR does must be reducible to documentation. There must be forms with everything spelled out, starting with recruiting posters, through position descriptions and performance evaluations
to termination procedures. Even the vocabulary is carefully controlled.
I learned this the hard way when I once rated an employee whose productivity was less than half of the project average one notch below "fully satisfactory." The amount of effort and paperwork related to that individual that ensued during the following year
was simply not worth the effort.
HR is not (and cannot be) well suited to addresing behavioural or social isues which are at the heart of what KM needs to function sucessfully. Behaviors such as sharing and collaboration are softer and fuzzier and much more dificult to document and measure.
All-important positive or negative atitudes are difficult to quantify. "You know it when you see it" won't stand up in court! You can document that someone participated in an activity but not so much whether they helped or hindered the work of a group.
This is why I contend that desirable KM behavior rests squarely in the realm of leadership and culture - not HR. Does this mean that we should give up trying to enhance KM behaviour? Absoltely not! But taking action requires that we first understand relationships
between KM, social context, and social interaction. To that end, I recently put together a framework that integratres the three processes in a way that enbles idenfying key issues and appropriate management actions. Although it is only a start, it is a step
forward.
|
|
Murray Jennex
I hear you and agree! My main point is that it is up to us to demonstrate the value of KM in terms they will accept, not an easy job!
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
-----Original Message----- From: soha radwan soharadwan@... [sikmleaders] To: sikmleaders Sent: Sat, Nov 11, 2017 11:50 pm Subject: Re: [sikmleaders] Re: Calculating KM employees' productivity The Engineer Productivity model makes high sense, thanks a lot, it is really interesting. But as you know sometimes people in the HR doesn't want to change a specific method they use.
I like the way you put it, the way you instantly give options for measurement. This kind of flexibility is needed in today's work. May be the real struggle for KM/ innovation and other alike activities is derived mainly from rigid thinking in other parts (departments) of the organization. They don't always have the same rhythm.
From: "Murray Jennex murphjen@... [sikmleaders]" <sikmleaders@...> To: sikmleaders@... Sent: Sunday, 12 November 2017, 11:35 Subject: Re: [sikmleaders] Re: Calculating KM employe es' productivity you need some artifact to measure. If you look at the engineer productivity model I sent you can see that it included things like number of reports or analyses, drawing changes, etc. KM can be expected to make a knowledge worker more proficient in producing their work artifacts. Unfortunately, I don't know of any productivity model that HR will accept that does not include some discreet artifact that is produced and can be measured in some way. You could possibly use customer interactions and problem resolutions as measures, but I don't think you will be able to get away with using something like customer satisfaction. In all cases though to quantify using numbers of artifacts this will include some time measurement component, such as artifacts per hour or per day
-----Original Message-----
From: soha radwan soharadwan@... [sikmleaders] <sikmleaders@...> To: sikmleaders <sikmleaders@...> Sent: Sat, Nov 11, 2017 10:51 pm Subject: Re: [sikmleaders] Re: Calculating KM employees' productivity May be we will not be able to quantify it this way, given that we are currently developing new social activities that focus on increasing creativity and innovation (which relies on intensive quality attributes rather than quantifiable number of hours) . But may be we can think of new ways to ensure employees are doing their jobs and achieving their goals without sticking to 'number of hours' concept, and then link it to productivity (output/input)
From: "Murray Jennex murphjen@... [sikmleaders]" <sikmleaders@...> To: sikmleaders@... Sent: Sunday, 12 November 2017, 10:36 Subject: Re: [sikmleaders] Re: Calcula ting KM employees' productivity its done frequently and frankly, if you can't do it then you aren't likely to be able to quantify productivity, sorry.
-----Original Message-----
From: soha radwan soharadwan@... [sikmleaders] <sikmleaders@...> To: sikmleaders <sikmleaders@...> Sent: Sat, Nov 11, 2017 10:04 pm Subject: Re: [sikmleaders] Re: Calculating KM employees' productivity Thanks Murray, but it is somewhat challenging to assign average number of hours, especially for some new activities
From: "Murray Jennex murphjen@... [sikmleaders]" <sikmleaders@...> To: sikmleaders@... Sent: Thursday, 9 November 2017, 10:52 Subject: Re: [sikmleaders] Re: Calculating KM employees' productivity the simple solution might just be to do a job task analysis and then assign an average number of hours for each task, this is the basis for the individual productivity model I sent you, and HR was accepting of it as it was the best quantification effort they'd seen at that point....murray
-----Original Message-----
From: soha radwan soharadwan@... [sikmleaders] <sikmleaders@...> To: sikmleaders <sikmleaders@...> Sent: Wed, Nov 8, 2017 8:45 pm Subject: Re: [sikmleaders] Re: Calculating KM employees' productivity Thanks a lot Albert. And looking forward to knowing more about the framework you put.
Meanwhile I am still struggling to give the HR an exact number of hours per year for each KM activity, and struggling more in trying to convince them to at least go by work days not working hours. Honestly the point is not only about the calculation, but it is more about explaining the reason behind time taken in many activities which can not be " reducible into documentation" as you said it.
From: "Albert Simard albert.simard@... [sikmleaders]" <sikmleaders@...> To: "sikmleaders@yahoogrou ps.com" <sikmleaders@...> Sent: Wednesday, 8 November 2017, 19:05 Subject: [sikmleaders] Re: Calculating KM employees' productivity The challenge, as I see it, is that HR must be able to demonstrate that everyone is treated exactly the same and by the book. There are not inconsequential legal iplications for failing to do so. And the laws are sufficiently complicaged that it requires
specialists to know them. This, in turn, requires that everythiong that HR does must be reducible to documentation. There must be forms with everything spelled out, starting with recruiting posters, through position descriptions and performance evaluations
to termination procedures. Even the vocabulary is carefully controlled.
I learned this the hard way when I once rated an employee whose productivity was less than half of the project average one notch below "fully satisfactory." The amount of effort and paperwork related to that individual that ensued during the following year
was simply not worth the effort.
HR is not (and cannot be) well suited to addresing behavioural or social isues which are at the heart of what KM needs to function sucessfully. Behaviors such as sharing and collaboration are softer and fuzzier and much more dificult to document and measure.
All-important positive or negative atitudes are difficult to quantify. "You know it when you see it" won't stand up in court! You can document that someone participated in an activity but not so much whether they helped or hindered the work of a group.
This is why I contend that desirable KM behavior rests squarely in the realm of leadership and culture - not HR. Does this mean that we should give up trying to enhance KM behaviour? Absoltely not! But taking action requires that we first understand relationships
between KM, social context, and social interaction. To that end, I recently put together a framework that integratres the three processes in a way that enbles idenfying key issues and appropriate management actions. Although it is only a start, it is a step
forward.
|
|