Date   

Re: Twitter #Twitter

Yao Ge
 
Edited

Like many Web 2.0 technologies, Micro-blogging on the Internet (such
as Twitter) is much more easier to take root than do it within the
enterprise environment. We had some internal discussion
on "Twittering for Business" recently. All social tools would make a
lot of sense once a critical mass is reached within the
organization. Micro-blogging and IM has some good potential to
displace e-mail in workplace (which is heavily abused) due to itself
strong social networking features.

I just get started with Twittering a couple of weeks ago... now I am
following Matt. :-)


Twitter #Twitter

Don Kildebeck
 

Oh yes, Twitter. Tried it.....here's my feelings about it:
 
 

-------------- Original message --------------
From: Peter Dorfman

I think the other members have put it pretty well. I'd say go for it. I might
even feel moved to blog.

Hey....how many of you Twitter? I've just tried it for the first time. I suppose
there might be lots of people who really need to tweet, have a practical reason
for it, but I don't, as a function of what I do, so it left me feeling just a
bit, how shall I put this...narcissistic? Have you ever had that feeling about
any of these Web 2 gimmicks?

Peter Dorfman

On Wed Jul 2 13:45 , 'Stan Garfield' <stangarfield@gmail.com> sent:

>
>APQC has offered to play a larger role in supporting the SIKM Leaders
>Community. This could include con call logistics, providing wider
>access to presentations, and providing a blog platform.
>
>Before agreeing to any of this, I wanted to ask the members for their
>views. If you agree, disagree, or have other s uggestions on this topic,
>please reply to this thread. No decisions will be made without first
>notifying the members.
>
>Regards,
>Stan
>
>
>--- In sikmleaders@yahoogroups.com, Bill Kaplan wrote:
>> I would suggest considering a multiple set of candidate sponsors if
>this
>> is the approach taken.
>
>
>--- In sikmleaders@yahoogroups.com, Mike Koffman wrote:
>> Stan, if you put all these presentations together you will have a nice
>> book of readings. Perhaps that is something to consider. Over time,
>> quite a bit of intellectual capital has passed through this community.
>> A volunteer committee might pick the "best" offerings and seek to get
>> release permission from the authors. Perhaps an APQC-sponsored
>> publica tion? The nice idea to me is the concept of a publication
>> emanating from a an on-line virtual community.
>
>
>
>
>------------------------------------
>
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
> To visit your group on the web, go to:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/sikmleaders/
>
> Your email settings:
> Individual Email | Traditional
>
> To change settings online go to:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/sikmleaders/join
> (Yahoo! ID required)
>
> To change settings via email:
> sikmleaders-digest@yahoogroups.com
> sikmleaders-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com
& gt;
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> sikmleaders-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>


Making SIKM Presentations More Widely Available #APQC

Matt Moore <laalgadger@...>
 

Hi,

In terms of the intellectual property issues, may I suggest that we badge the our materials using a Creative Comons license. Have a look here: http://creativecommons.org/

This has some benefits:
  • We may want this material distributed within the KM community so it benefits as many practitioners as possible.
  • However we may not want people reselling it as is.
  • We do want proper attribution of people's work.
  • We don't want to have to pay some platform provider to access our own IP at a later date.

What do you think?

Matt


Twitter #Twitter

Matt Moore <laalgadger@...>
 

Peter,

I have had a Twitter account for nearly a year but only got into it in the last 3 months. The observation I would make is: Like all social software, Twitter is not much fun if you are doing it by yourself. It becomes fun (& useful) when there is a group of you on there. I was at a conference a couple of weeks ago where half the audience (noo meeja) were Twittering & the other half (auld meeja) weren't. An eye-opener. And Twitter has actually demonstrated some ROI for me.

BTW My Twitter ID is innotecture if anyone wants to connect.

Cheers,

Matt


--- On Wed, 7/2/08, Peter Dorfman wrote:
From: Peter Dorfman
Subject: Re: [sikmleaders] Making SIKM Presentations More Widely Available
To: sikmleaders@...
Date: Wednesday, July 2, 2008, 11:13 PM

I think the other members have put it pretty well. I'd say go for it. I might
even feel moved to blog.

Hey....how many of you Twitter? I've just tried it for the first time. I suppose
there might be lots of people who really need to tweet, have a practical reason
for it, but I don't, as a function of what I do, so it left me feeling just a
bit, how shall I put this...narcissistic ? Have you ever had that feeling about
any of these Web 2 gimmicks?

Peter Dorfman


Recent Activity
Visit Your Group
Y! Messenger

All together now

Host a free online

conference on IM.

Family Photos

Learn how to best

capture your

family moments.

All-Bran

Day 10 Club

on Yahoo! Groups

Feel better with fiber.

.



Re: Making SIKM Presentations More Widely Available #APQC

Pugh, Katrina <katrina.pugh@...>
 

Hi, All –

This sounds good to me, and a great affiliation.  

 

  • Will there be any type of gardener role, so that we can begin to tag/connect our past presentations?

 

  • Also, I know something like this was said earlier, but we should have some governance principles, such as, when we quote each other for a revenue-oriented situation (say, as a consultant), we acknowledge the author, send a thanks, or something.

Kate

 

Katrina Pugh
VP, Knowledge Management
IT Center of Excellence
Fidelity Investments, Personal and Workplace Investing
400 Puritan Way M3J
Marlborough, MA 01752
(O) 508 357 3236
(M) 781 258 0920
katrina.pugh@...
Email
Confidentiality Notice: The information in this email and subsequent attachments may contain confidential information that is intended solely for the attention and use of the named addressee(s). This message or any part thereof must not be disclosed, copied, distributed or retained by any person without authorization from Fidelity Investments.


From: sikmleaders@... [mailto:sikmleaders@...] On Behalf Of Stan Garfield
Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2008 1:46 PM
To: sikmleaders@...
Subject: [sikmleaders] Making SIKM Presentations More Widely Available

 


APQC has offered to play a larger role in supporting the SIKM Leaders
Community. This could include con call logistics, providing wider
access to presentations, and providing a blog platform.

Before agreeing to any of this, I wanted to ask the members for their
views. If you agree, disagree, or have other suggestions on this topic,
please reply to this thread. No decisions will be made without first
notifying the members.

Regards,
Stan

--- In sikmleaders@yahoogroups.com, Bill Kaplan wrote:
> I would suggest considering a multiple set of candidate sponsors if
this
> is the approach taken.

--- In sikmleaders@yahoogroups.com, Mike Koffman wrote:
> Stan, if you put all these presentations together you will have a nice
> book of readings. Perhaps that is something to consider. Over time,
> quite a bit of intellectual capital has passed through this community.
> A volunteer committee might pick the "best" offerings and seek to get
> release permission from the authors. Perhaps an APQC-sponsored
> publication? The nice idea to me is the concept of a publication
> emanating from a an on-line virtual community.


Re: Have you used/worked with Alfresco? #content-management

Gian Jagai
 

Hi Miguel,

Thanks very much for the detailed feedback! Seems that you have done
some trials with it. Did you try to see how it might integrate with
Sharepoint? I only ask because we have sharepoint and users are
getting the hang of it. But I can see other groups wanting to by pass
it and use Alfresco. Thus linking the two at some level would be useful.

Peace,
Gian...

--- In sikmleaders@..., "Cornejo Castro, Miguel"
<miguel.cornejo@...> wrote:

Hi Gian,

I've done several concepts on it (practical trials mostly), no full
roll-outs. It's a very solid document management platform, very
friendly for developers, with nice touches that will or will not be
relevant to you depending on goals. Integrates very well with other
tools, and supports both MS and open standards. The coming version 3.0
showcased in Barcelona adds a further layer of collaboration tools and
tricks, plus better tools for building interfaces, that make it a
great KM tool.

Sticking to current features and comparisons with tools I've worked
with and implemented, IMHO... :

- It's nimbler than FileNet but (on a document management level) at
least as good, without some of the worst gaffes of IBM's acquisition.
Alfresco is much more friendly for customization. Good support (on
both Community and Enterprise versions) beats my experience of
FileNet. No per-user (or other) license costs makes it cost-effective
on both large and cash-strapped organizations. You can get quality
integrators for both. On the process automatization level (BPM) they
are not on the same league: while Alfresco supports administrative
routing and can be proficient for most uses (indeed I've used it to
teach practical BPR), FileNet's processes can be exponentially more
complex, leading to powerful integrations with other tools.

- It's far more serious than Sharepoint. While MS's tool does a
decent job of supporting team collaboration, Sharepoint is very bad at
the document management angle (lack of serious searching, for one,
makes it a bad KM solution), a poor integrated web solution, and not
though for use as a serious development platform. It's like a house
without the foundations. Alfresco has very good foundations and
currently a nice collaboration feature set (conversation support
stands out), but as of today, the MS solution incorporates some tricks
that Alfresco does not have (wiki, blog). Still, Sharepoint's
integrated tricks are substandard: neither the bulletin boards nor the
blog nor the wiki are especially good nor stand well against the
competition. And Sharepoint locks you into a Microsoft environment
while you can use Alfresco in a mixed house of Linux, Mac and Windows
(and Open Office and MS Office and...).

Re the "open source vs corporate support" question, Alfresco has hit
a sweet spot because it has both:
http://emekaeme.wordpress.com/2008/04/25/talking-open-source-with-john-newton-alfresco-ceo/

That's about it for current features. If you're looking for the
collaboration toolset, though, you would do well to browse the new
Community feature set... full integration of wiki and blog stalwarts
such as Mediawiki and Wordpress are just half the fun. I especially
like the way they manage collaboration with people outside the
organization.

Hope it helps a bit. Of course, the relevance of all this depends on
the goals you want to attain with the tool... there's better tools for
many uses.

Best regards,

Miguel

________________________________
De: sikmleaders@... [mailto:sikmleaders@...]
En nombre de gjagai
Enviado el: lunes, 30 de junio de 2008 22:45
Para: sikmleaders@...
Asunto: [sikmleaders] Have you used/worked with Alfresco?


Hi,

I was curious if anyone in the SIKM group has used or knows of someone
who has used the Alfresco Open Source Content Mgmt platform
(http://www.alfresco.com/).

Appreciate your thoughts and insights. And if you compared it with any
other platforms.

Thanks
Gian...
HDS Global Services Knowledge Management Program


Re: Making SIKM Presentations More Widely Available #APQC

David Snowden <snowded@...>
 

Its not like being taken over by Dr Dan the certification man
I would go with it



Dave Snowden
Founder & Chief Scientific Officer
Cognitive Edge Pte Ltd

Now blogging at www.cognitive-edge.com


On 2 Jul 2008, at 19:32, Continuous Innovation wrote:

Stan,

It sounds like a win-win if you are able to maintain the leadership and 
control over the selection of presenters and the presentation timetable. 
I am assuming that the APQC will be profiled as the Sponsor and that 
circulation and intellectual property rights remain with the presenter. 
Expanding the audience to include APQC-related KM contacts would be 
beneficial.

Are you and HP comfortable with APQC involvement?

Have you received a time and budgetary commitment from the APQC (e.g., a 
trial period of three-months leading to a minimum of a one-year 
commitment of sponsorship and resources)?

Best regards,
Peter

Stan Garfield wrote:
>
>
> APQC has offered to play a larger role in supporting the SIKM Leaders
> Community. This could include con call logistics, providing wider
> access to presentations, and providing a blog platform.
>
> Before agreeing to any of this, I wanted to ask the members for their
> views. If you agree, disagree, or have other suggestions on this topic,
> please reply to this thread. No decisions will be made without first
> notifying the members.
>
> Regards,
> Stan
>



Re: Making SIKM Presentations More Widely Available #APQC

Peter Dorfman <pdorfman@...>
 
Edited

I've sounded off in a couple of places about the cost of getting from place to
place causing a drop in travel and diminishing opportunities for face to face
communications. If that leads to more remote work and more work-at-home
situations, then I suspect businesses will see a case for micro-blogging as a
medium for "presence management." It's the same case that's been made for IM in
the workplace.

Peter Dorfman


Re: Making SIKM Presentations More Widely Available #APQC

Kaplan, Bill <bill.kaplan@...>
 

Sounds reasonable

 

William S. Kaplan, CPCM

Chief Knowledge Officer

Acquisition Solutions, Inc.

 

(w) 703.253.6313

(c)  571.238.9878

 

"Knowledge at Work"

 

The information contained in this message may be privileged, confidential, and protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to this message, and then delete it from your computer.

 

 

From: sikmleaders@... [mailto:sikmleaders@...] On Behalf Of Albert Simard
Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2008 14:37
To: sikmleaders@...
Subject: Re: [sikmleaders] Making SIKM Presentations More WidelyAvailable

 

This idea is intriguing from a number of perspectives.  I suspect that APQC sees this as a way to gain access to a rich body of content and perhaps some profile by linking to a world-class body of KM expertise.  On the other hand, SIKM might be able to benefit from not worying about day-to-day logistics and it might gain a high-profile platform for any products that it chooses to produce.

 

First some caveats:

  • Control of SIKM activities would have to remain with the group.
  • Membership would have to remain the prerogative of SIKM, regardless of APQC affiliation. 
  • Intellectual property should remain with SIKM.
  • Access should be at the discretion of SIKM (again, regardless of APQC affiliation). 

I see none of these limitations as onerous or deal-breaking.

 

Now the benefits for SIKM:

  • Eliminating the cost and effort of running SIKM
  • Providing a platform for disseminating products that we may wish to product from time to time. 
  • Endorsement of SIKM's work.  Any of us can distribute KM material via the web, as I have.  However that makes it just personal opinion, as an authored document or peresentation.  If, however, the material were incorporated into a SIKM product and distributed by APQC, it weould have notably more prestige.
  • I may be reiterating Bill's views somewhat less eloquently, but who knows - SIKM could end up as a case study for social networking success!  

Al Simard


Re: Making SIKM Presentations More Widely Available #APQC

Albert Simard <simarda@...>
 

This idea is intriguing from a number of perspectives.  I suspect that APQC sees this as a way to gain access to a rich body of content and perhaps some profile by linking to a world-class body of KM expertise.  On the other hand, SIKM might be able to benefit from not worying about day-to-day logistics and it might gain a high-profile platform for any products that it chooses to produce.
 
First some caveats:
  • Control of SIKM activities would have to remain with the group.
  • Membership would have to remain the prerogative of SIKM, regardless of APQC affiliation. 
  • Intellectual property should remain with SIKM.
  • Access should be at the discretion of SIKM (again, regardless of APQC affiliation). 
I see none of these limitations as onerous or deal-breaking.
 
Now the benefits for SIKM:
  • Eliminating the cost and effort of running SIKM
  • Providing a platform for disseminating products that we may wish to product from time to time. 
  • Endorsement of SIKM's work.  Any of us can distribute KM material via the web, as I have.  However that makes it just personal opinion, as an authored document or peresentation.  If, however, the material were incorporated into a SIKM product and distributed by APQC, it weould have notably more prestige.
  • I may be reiterating Bill's views somewhat less eloquently, but who knows - SIKM could end up as a case study for social networking success!  
Al Simard


Re: Making SIKM Presentations More Widely Available #APQC

Peter West
 

Stan,

It sounds like a win-win if you are able to maintain the leadership and control over the selection of presenters and the presentation timetable. I am assuming that the APQC will be profiled as the Sponsor and that circulation and intellectual property rights remain with the presenter. Expanding the audience to include APQC-related KM contacts would be beneficial.

Are you and HP comfortable with APQC involvement?

Have you received a time and budgetary commitment from the APQC (e.g., a trial period of three-months leading to a minimum of a one-year commitment of sponsorship and resources)?

Best regards,
Peter

Stan Garfield wrote:



APQC has offered to play a larger role in supporting the SIKM Leaders
Community. This could include con call logistics, providing wider
access to presentations, and providing a blog platform.

Before agreeing to any of this, I wanted to ask the members for their
views. If you agree, disagree, or have other suggestions on this topic,
please reply to this thread. No decisions will be made without first
notifying the members.

Regards,
Stan


Re: Making SIKM Presentations More Widely Available #APQC

Peter Dorfman <pdorfman@...>
 

I think the other members have put it pretty well. I'd say go for it. I might
even feel moved to blog.

Hey....how many of you Twitter? I've just tried it for the first time. I suppose
there might be lots of people who really need to tweet, have a practical reason
for it, but I don't, as a function of what I do, so it left me feeling just a
bit, how shall I put this...narcissistic? Have you ever had that feeling about
any of these Web 2 gimmicks?

Peter Dorfman

On Wed Jul 2 13:45 , 'Stan Garfield' <stangarfield@...> sent:


APQC has offered to play a larger role in supporting the SIKM Leaders
Community. This could include con call logistics, providing wider
access to presentations, and providing a blog platform.

Before agreeing to any of this, I wanted to ask the members for their
views. If you agree, disagree, or have other suggestions on this topic,
please reply to this thread. No decisions will be made without first
notifying the members.

Regards,
Stan


--- In sikmleaders@..., Bill Kaplan wrote:
I would suggest considering a multiple set of candidate sponsors if
this
is the approach taken.

--- In sikmleaders@..., Mike Koffman wrote:
Stan, if you put all these presentations together you will have a nice
book of readings. Perhaps that is something to consider. Over time,
quite a bit of intellectual capital has passed through this community.
A volunteer committee might pick the "best" offerings and seek to get
release permission from the authors. Perhaps an APQC-sponsored
publication? The nice idea to me is the concept of a publication
emanating from a an on-line virtual community.



------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links

To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/sikmleaders/

Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/sikmleaders/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

To change settings via email:
sikmleaders-digest@...
sikmleaders-fullfeatured@...

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
sikmleaders-unsubscribe@...

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/


Re: Making SIKM Presentations More Widely Available #APQC

Kaplan, Bill <bill.kaplan@...>
 

Curious…Why are they offering to do this?  What is the WIIFM for them?

 

William S. Kaplan, CPCM

Chief Knowledge Officer

Acquisition Solutions, Inc.

 

(w) 703.253.6313

(c)  571.238.9878

 

"Knowledge at Work"

 

The information contained in this message may be privileged, confidential, and protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to this message, and then delete it from your computer.

 

 

From: sikmleaders@... [mailto:sikmleaders@...] On Behalf Of Stan Garfield
Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2008 13:46
To: sikmleaders@...
Subject: [sikmleaders] Making SIKM Presentations More Widely Available

 


APQC has offered to play a larger role in supporting the SIKM Leaders
Community. This could include con call logistics, providing wider
access to presentations, and providing a blog platform.

Before agreeing to any of this, I wanted to ask the members for their
views. If you agree, disagree, or have other suggestions on this topic,
please reply to this thread. No decisions will be made without first
notifying the members.

Regards,
Stan

--- In sikmleaders@..., Bill Kaplan wrote:
> I would suggest considering a multiple set of candidate sponsors if
this
> is the approach taken.

--- In sikmleaders@..., Mike Koffman wrote:
> Stan, if you put all these presentations together you will have a nice
> book of readings. Perhaps that is something to consider. Over time,
> quite a bit of intellectual capital has passed through this community.
> A volunteer committee might pick the "best" offerings and seek to get
> release permission from the authors. Perhaps an APQC-sponsored
> publication? The nice idea to me is the concept of a publication
> emanating from a an on-line virtual community.


Making SIKM Presentations More Widely Available #APQC

Stan Garfield
 
Edited

APQC has offered to play a larger role in supporting the SIKM Leaders
Community. This could include con call logistics, providing wider
access to presentations, and providing a blog platform.

Before agreeing to any of this, I wanted to ask the members for their
views. If you agree, disagree, or have other suggestions on this topic,
please reply to this thread. No decisions will be made without first
notifying the members.

Regards,
Stan

--- In sikmleaders@..., Bill Kaplan wrote:
I would suggest considering a multiple set of candidate sponsors if this is the approach taken.
--- In sikmleaders@..., Mike Koffman wrote:
Stan, if you put all these presentations together you will have a nice
book of readings. Perhaps that is something to consider. Over time,
quite a bit of intellectual capital has passed through this community.
A volunteer committee might pick the "best" offerings and seek to get
release permission from the authors. Perhaps an APQC-sponsored
publication? The nice idea to me is the concept of a publication
emanating from a an on-line virtual community.


Online open house for Knowledge Management at Kent State, Wednesday, July 9 #learning

Thomas J. Froehlich
 

On Wednesday, July 9, 2008, from 6 PM to 7:30 PM, there will be an online, interactive session on the certificate program and Master of Science degree in Knowledge Management at Kent State University. For information about joining this online open house, go to: http://iakm.kent.edu/kmonline/ The session will also be recorded, so interested parties can access it immediately following the event.

Potential students are encouraged to make time for this informational meeting. They will be able to access the presentation as it occurs and will be able to ask questions through their computers online.

Dr. Thomas J. Froehlich, Director of the Masters Program in Information Architecture and Knowledge Management, will provide an overview of the program and its online options in the area of Knowledge Management.

Dr. Denise Bedford will speak about her background, experience and expertise in knowledge management and will provide an overview of the two courses she will be teaching for the IAKM program in the fall, Foundational Principles of Knowledge Management and the Economics of Information.

Dr. Bedford holds a Ph.D. in Information Science from the University of California, Berkeley. She has been the Senior Information Officer at the World Bank since 1997, where she is responsible for management of the World Bank’s core metadata strategy, including content type strategy and the various ontologies that support Bank metadata.

She has taught courses at the University of Tennessee, Georgetown University, Catholic University of America, University of Richmond, and George Mason University.


Re: Have you used/worked with Alfresco? #content-management

Cornejo Castro, Miguel <miguel.cornejo@...>
 

Hi Gian,
 
I've done several concepts on it (practical trials mostly), no full roll-outs. It's a very solid document management platform, very friendly for developers, with nice touches that will or will not be relevant to you depending on goals. Integrates very well with other tools, and supports both MS and open standards. The coming version 3.0 showcased in Barcelona adds a further layer of collaboration tools and tricks, plus better tools for building interfaces, that make it a great KM tool.
 
Sticking to current features and comparisons with tools I've worked with and implemented, IMHO... :
 
- It's nimbler than FileNet but (on a document management level) at least as good, without some of the worst gaffes of IBM's acquisition. Alfresco is much more friendly for customization. Good support (on both Community and Enterprise versions) beats my experience of FileNet. No per-user (or other) license costs makes it cost-effective on both large and cash-strapped organizations. You can get quality integrators for both. On the process automatization level (BPM) they are not on the same league: while Alfresco supports administrative routing and can be proficient for most uses (indeed I've used it to teach practical BPR), FileNet's processes can be exponentially more complex, leading to powerful integrations with other tools.
 
- It's far more serious than Sharepoint. While MS's tool does a decent job of supporting team collaboration, Sharepoint is very bad at the document management angle (lack of serious searching, for one, makes it a bad KM solution), a poor integrated web solution, and not though for use as a serious development platform. It's like a house without the foundations. Alfresco has very good foundations and currently a nice collaboration feature set (conversation support stands out), but as of today, the MS solution incorporates some tricks that Alfresco does not have (wiki, blog). Still, Sharepoint's integrated tricks are substandard: neither the bulletin boards nor the blog nor the wiki are especially good nor stand well against the competition. And Sharepoint locks you into a Microsoft environment while you can use Alfresco in a mixed house of Linux, Mac and Windows (and Open Office and MS Office and...).
 
Re the "open source vs corporate support" question, Alfresco has hit a sweet spot because it has both:
 
That's about it for current features. If you're looking for the collaboration toolset, though, you would do well to browse the new Community feature set... full integration of wiki and blog stalwarts such as Mediawiki and Wordpress are just half the fun. I especially like the way they manage collaboration with people outside the organization.
 
Hope it helps a bit. Of course, the relevance of all this depends on the goals you want to attain with the tool... there's better tools for many uses.
 
Best regards,
 
Miguel


De: sikmleaders@... [mailto:sikmleaders@...] En nombre de gjagai
Enviado el: lunes, 30 de junio de 2008 22:45
Para: sikmleaders@...
Asunto: [sikmleaders] Have you used/worked with Alfresco?

Hi,

I was curious if anyone in the SIKM group has used or knows of someone
who has used the Alfresco Open Source Content Mgmt platform
(http://www.alfresco.com/).

Appreciate your thoughts and insights. And if you compared it with any
other platforms.

Thanks
Gian...
HDS Global Services Knowledge Management Program


Have you used/worked with Alfresco? #content-management

Gian Jagai
 

Hi,

I was curious if anyone in the SIKM group has used or knows of someone
who has used the Alfresco Open Source Content Mgmt platform
(http://www.alfresco.com/).

Appreciate your thoughts and insights. And if you compared it with any
other platforms.

Thanks
Gian...
HDS Global Services Knowledge Management Program


KM Method Cards #methods

laalgadger <laalgadger@...>
 

Back in 2006, Tom Short (how is the job hunting going BTW) posted a
query about running a KM workshop. And using KM cards was mentioned.
Patrick Lambe has actually done this and the cards are available here:
http://www.greenchameleon.com/gc/blog_detail/km_method_cards/

I realise advertising on this list is a bit of a no-no but it does
link back to previous discussion - and I have a pack and like them...


Re: Paper you wrote on CoPs #CoP

Valdis Krebs <valdis@...>
 

You might find this work @ IBM of interest...

http://www.orgnet.com/emergent.html

Follow the links on that page for more in-depth info.

Valdis Krebs
http://www.orgnet.com

On Jun 24, 2008, at 3:44 PM, lisalbeck wrote:

Hi Carol,

I hope you are well. I couldn't find your email so hope this reaches
you.

I had noted that you are publishing an article covering your work with
CoPs. Has that been published yet? If so, can you direct me to it?

We are finally diving into CoPs so need all of the best thinking we
can get and the literature search you did sounds very valuable as well
as your findings.

Best regards,
Lisa Beckers
Deloitte Consulting


------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links



SLA's Knowledge management Certificate Program #knowledge-services #certification #learning

rademary <mtradem@...>
 

I haven't personally attended any of these sessions, but am a member
of SLA (Special Library Association) and get these alerts quite
frequently. Passing along in case someone is looking for a reputable
organization from which to gain a KM certificate.
Mary Morgan


Take advantage of an exclusive SLA member benefit and register for
the repeat session of the popular course Introduction to Knowledge
Management and Knowledge Services, the first course of Click U's
Knowledge Management Certificates program. Registration is limited.
To ensure you get a seat register NOW!

KMKS01 Introduction to Knowledge Management and Knowledge Services

This course identifies the essential theoretical and practical
concepts for understanding the role of knowledge management and
knowledge services in the organizational workplace and provides basic
definitions and service delivery models for managing information,
knowledge and learning in the workplace. Topics covered include:

• history of knowledge management and knowledge services
• descriptions and concepts related to knowledge management and
knowledge services
• definitions of knowledge management and knowledge services
• knowledge management and knowledge services in the
corporate/organizational management environment
• the role of knowledge management and knowledge services in building
the knowledge culture for the parent organization

Course Learning Objectives

At the end of this course, participants will acquire a history of
knowledge management and knowledge services; they will also examine
and analyze descriptions and concepts related to knowledge management
and knowledge services. Participants will be able to identify and
summarize definitions of knowledge management and knowledge services.
Participants will also be able to define the role of knowledge
management and knowledge services in the corporate/organizational
management environment and recognize the role of knowledge management
and knowledge services in building the knowledge culture for the
parent organization.

For more detailed course information please visit Click U: KMKS01
Course Information

Course Dates: 7 - 24 July 2008 [3 weeks]

Completion of this course counts towards all three Certificates in
the Knowledge Management Certificates Program. Please see: KM
Certificates

Questions? Want more information? Need the detailed course schedule?
Email: clicku@...

An Important Note: While the primary goal in developing these
programs is to allow SLA members to earn one or more certificates,
each of these courses has inherent value and any course may be taken
à la carte.

9341 - 9360 of 10200