Date   

Re: Wiki #wikis

Albert Simard <simarda@...>
 

Dave -
 
Actually, I edited the original article (there was one legitimately problematic paragraph) and then recast as a sub-heading under knowledge markets.  I'm happy to note that both have lasted more than a year and that others have added content to give them additional breadth and depth.
 
 
 
You probably didn't see it because, somehow, I forgot to include a link to KM in the article (which I just added)!  So, I'm happy; the Wikipedia philosophy remains intact; and there's more KM stuff than is apparent at first glance.
 
Al Simard


Re: Wiki #wikis

Martin@Cleaver.org <martin@...>
 

Perhaps the SIKM wiki could start off as 1) a place to articulate and
refine the purpose of the group and 2) a Capture and Reorganization
tool for the mailing list.

1) A wiki is a good place to define and evolve a set of concepts.
Unlike in email, wiki-based content is not scattered across
disconnected threads: it's all in one place, and can be continually
refactored to improve the Signal:Noise ration. Yahoo Groups just
organizes by date, but for everything else you have to search, and
there is no way for readers to improve the quality of the content.

Our first purpose for using wiki could well be to define our
requirements for a different online space. A wiki may or may not be
sufficient, until we've defined and agreed I don't think we'll know.

Whereever we go the hard bit is likely to be to get engagement in
another online place. The "nice" thing about email is that it's
available to everyone everywhere. We all have email, even when
disconnected. Not everyone uses RSS and its read-only anyhow.

This leads me to my next point.

2) It's possible to automate such that the wiki captures every email
that comes through a mailing list. We can start by having the intent
that not only are conversations captured as they occur today, but, so
that as time passes, the message of each conversation can be reworked,
for example to include extra hyperlinks and landing pages to cater for
additional purposes. In itself, capture-for-reorganization is
valuable.

On a wiki, nuggets can be surfaced, promoted, and made into root
concepts off of which everything else can hang. (This is not to say
that someone must reorganize content. No, it's just that a wiki has
this capability as an affordance. Reorganization is a constructivist
task, most valuable to the reorganizer. Newcomers may find such
articulation of other's concepts a useful way of learning. Old timers
will be able to see the ways in which newcomers are interpreting their
thoughts. This affords a tacit-explicit loop learning process which
people may or may not take advantage of.)


Regards,
Martin


--
Martin Cleaver M.Sc. MBA
Martin.Cleaver@...
+1 416-786-6752 (GMT-5)


Re: Wiki #wikis

David Snowden <snowded@...>
 

Well I've been editing it on KM related pages for two years now and haven't seen that.  Also avant guarde is not a criteria for deletion.  I you put something there it has to be supported but citations which is a good discipline.  Let me have the diff on the one which was pulled so I can have a look at it. 

If you want to do original research then the WIkipedia is not the place for it



Dave Snowden
Founder & Chief Scientific Officer
Cognitive Edge Pte Ltd

Now blogging at www.cognitive-edge.com


On 28 Jul 2008, at 15:06, Albert Simard wrote:


Dave -
 
Been there; done that.  I've posted or contributed to about a dozen KM-related Wikipedia articles (although not all that much in the past while.  I've even had the joy of having an article on knowledge services pulled after a group discussion concluded that it was too "avant guarde" for Wikipedia (a new indicator for leading-edge work!).
 
I don't think that Wikipedia is the right place for developing a new concept such as criteria for life-cycle management of knowledge.
 
Al Simard



Re: Wiki #wikis

Albert Simard <simarda@...>
 

Dave -
 
Been there; done that.  I've posted or contributed to about a dozen KM-related Wikipedia articles (although not all that much in the past while.  I've even had the joy of having an article on knowledge services pulled after a group discussion concluded that it was too "avant guarde" for Wikipedia (a new indicator for leading-edge work!).
 
I don't think that Wikipedia is the right place for developing a new concept such as criteria for life-cycle management of knowledge.
 
Al Simard


Re: New poll for sikmleaders - Create a wiki page? #wikis #poll

Yao Ge
 

I think one of the draw back of Yahoo Group is it is relatively closed participation in discussion. IMHO, we should have a team blogging environment that each member can post topics of interest or ask a question. The commenting of the blog post should be open to public this can potentially more effective as I have cases in the past that I forwarded the discussion to my co-worker, they want to causally join the discussion but no signed up as member.
 
Wiki is a knowledge base that are made up with topics that are contextually connected to each other (such as encyclopedia, or glossary). The wiki are more effective blogs when we have a need to co-author something (such as missions and objectives) or create something that a lot more neutral (within the group) such as summarizing an interesting topic by compiling our past discussions. However it can also used with stronger individual authorship (such as Google Knol). We just need to anwser this question - what are we missing with the current threaded discussion forum? I don't think we should put everything in Wikipedia as it is suited for discussion and exchange of point of views. We should, however, at least create a entry in Wikipedia definiting SIKM group and reference to our community site(s).
 
I think no matter what we do, we should keep all contents within one site (or two the most) so that we don't create fragementation and dilution to focus.
 
-Yao


From: sikmleaders@... [mailto:sikmleaders@...] On Behalf Of Patti Anklam
Sent: Monday, July 28, 2008 7:20 AM
To: sikmleaders@...
Subject: RE: [sikmleaders] New poll for sikmleaders

I agree wholeheartedly with Andrew (and Dave). I had the same feeling as he did with the mention of the wiki.  Contributing to Wikipedia has been problematic for many of us, I think, for various reasons. Any successful wiki starts with a shared, articulated goal and common sense of purpose. What is that for this group?

A wiki for SIKM could be a place to do both as Andrew suggests (focus on how you can achieve the goals of KM) as well as an organizing tool (for people to declare their intentions to work on specific topic areas, make commitments, and manage the work).

/patti

Patti Anklam
Leveraging Context, Knowledge, and Networks

http://www.pattianklam.com
(978)456-4175

Net Work: A Practical Guide to Creating and Sustaining Networks at Work and in the World is now available at Amazon.com and other online booksellers.

From: sikmleaders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:sikmleaders@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Andrew Gent
Sent: Sunday, July 27, 2008 4:06 PM
To: sikmleaders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [sikmleaders] New poll for sikmleaders

>> A new poll has been created for the sikmleaders group:

Hmm... unfortunately this poll doesn't really allow me to answer the question accurately. It is not a question of either/or.

  • Yes, I think we should contribute to the existing Wikipedia entries on topics related to KM.
  • No, I don't think we should enter all of the content we want to create into Wikipedia. It would be both inappropriate and not definitive enough for that much of an open audience.
  • Yes, I think there could be benefits to our creating our own wiki to develop other KM content.

When the wiki was first mentioned, I was not particularly fond of the idea. tehre seemed to be too much of the let's pool all of our knowledge into a definitive KM repository about the idea. Part of the reason I like the distribution list is because we can discuss things that we don't necessarily all agree with but we have sufficient experience and respect for each other that we can have an informed discussion about the details and alternatives. Sometimes we (or at least I) sit back and listen because I am not sure I agree, but I am interested in learning what others think.

If you then take that content and say "this is what we as the SI KM community think" to a larger audience, I may  be forced to come forward and state my objections. Or at least my doubts. Which would then tend to interrupt what I consider a very beneficial conversation.

That is not to say you can't also have active discussions within wikis. But that is not the best mechanism for back and forth.

So I guess what I am saying is this:

  • It is very important to me, as a member of SIKM, that we keep the discussion group for the discussions.
  • I also agree it would be useful (both to ourselves and others) if we, as Dave suggests, participate in the public articulation of the basic concepts of KM through the appropriate channels, most notably wikipedia.
  • I also think there could be uses for an SIKM wiki, assuming we start by agreeing, even loosely, to what the goals are for that wiki as distinct from the goals of the discussion and the public wikis.

Just as an example, an SIKM wiki might focus on how you can achieve the goals of KM (vs. the definition of what those goals are). I am not advocating that. I am just giving that as an example.

Andrew Gent
Knowledge Architect
Incredibly Dull


Re: New poll for sikmleaders - Create a wiki page? #wikis #poll

Patti Anklam <patti@...>
 

I agree wholeheartedly with Andrew (and Dave). I had the same feeling as he did with the mention of the wiki.  Contributing to Wikipedia has been problematic for many of us, I think, for various reasons. Any successful wiki starts with a shared, articulated goal and common sense of purpose. What is that for this group?

 

A wiki for SIKM could be a place to do both as Andrew suggests (focus on how you can achieve the goals of KM) as well as an organizing tool (for people to declare their intentions to work on specific topic areas, make commitments, and manage the work).

 

/patti

 

Patti Anklam
Leveraging Context, Knowledge, and Networks

http://www.pattianklam.com
(978)456-4175

Net Work: A Practical Guide to Creating and Sustaining Networks at Work and in the World is now available at Amazon.com and other online booksellers.

 

 

From: sikmleaders@... [mailto:sikmleaders@...] On Behalf Of Andrew Gent
Sent: Sunday, July 27, 2008 4:06 PM
To: sikmleaders@...
Subject: Re: [sikmleaders] New poll for sikmleaders

 

>> A new poll has been created for the sikmleaders group:

Hmm... unfortunately this poll doesn't really allow me to answer the question accurately. It is not a question of either/or.

  • Yes, I think we should contribute to the existing Wikipedia entries on topics related to KM.
  • No, I don't think we should enter all of the content we want to create into Wikipedia. It would be both inappropriate and not definitive enough for that much of an open audience.
  • Yes, I think there could be benefits to our creating our own wiki to develop other KM content.

When the wiki was first mentioned, I was not particularly fond of the idea. tehre seemed to be too much of the let's pool all of our knowledge into a definitive KM repository about the idea. Part of the reason I like the distribution list is because we can discuss things that we don't necessarily all agree with but we have sufficient experience and respect for each other that we can have an informed discussion about the details and alternatives. Sometimes we (or at least I) sit back and listen because I am not sure I agree, but I am interested in learning what others think.

If you then take that content and say "this is what we as the SI KM community think" to a larger audience, I may  be forced to come forward and state my objections. Or at least my doubts. Which would then tend to interrupt what I consider a very beneficial conversation.

That is not to say you can't also have active discussions within wikis. But that is not the best mechanism for back and forth.

So I guess what I am saying is this:

  • It is very important to me, as a member of SIKM, that we keep the discussion group for the discussions.
  • I also agree it would be useful (both to ourselves and others) if we, as Dave suggests, participate in the public articulation of the basic concepts of KM through the appropriate channels, most notably wikipedia.
  • I also think there could be uses for an SIKM wiki, assuming we start by agreeing, even loosely, to what the goals are for that wiki as distinct from the goals of the discussion and the public wikis.

Just as an example, an SIKM wiki might focus on how you can achieve the goals of KM (vs. the definition of what those goals are). I am not advocating that. I am just giving that as an example.

Andrew Gent
Knowledge Architect
Incredibly Dull

 

 


Re: New poll for sikmleaders - Create a wiki page? #wikis #poll

Andrew Gent <ajgent@...>
 

>> A new poll has been created for the sikmleaders group:

Hmm... unfortunately this poll doesn't really allow me to answer the question accurately. It is not a question of either/or.

  • Yes, I think we should contribute to the existing Wikipedia entries on topics related to KM.
  • No, I don't think we should enter all of the content we want to create into Wikipedia. It would be both inappropriate and not definitive enough for that much of an open audience.
  • Yes, I think there could be benefits to our creating our own wiki to develop other KM content.
When the wiki was first mentioned, I was not particularly fond of the idea. tehre seemed to be too much of the let's pool all of our knowledge into a definitive KM repository about the idea. Part of the reason I like the distribution list is because we can discuss things that we don't necessarily all agree with but we have sufficient experience and respect for each other that we can have an informed discussion about the details and alternatives. Sometimes we (or at least I) sit back and listen because I am not sure I agree, but I am interested in learning what others think.

If you then take that content and say "this is what we as the SI KM community think" to a larger audience, I may  be forced to come forward and state my objections. Or at least my doubts. Which would then tend to interrupt what I consider a very beneficial conversation.

That is not to say you can't also have active discussions within wikis. But that is not the best mechanism for back and forth.

So I guess what I am saying is this:

  • It is very important to me, as a member of SIKM, that we keep the discussion group for the discussions.
  • I also agree it would be useful (both to ourselves and others) if we, as Dave suggests, participate in the public articulation of the basic concepts of KM through the appropriate channels, most notably wikipedia.
  • I also think there could be uses for an SIKM wiki, assuming we start by agreeing, even loosely, to what the goals are for that wiki as distinct from the goals of the discussion and the public wikis.
Just as an example, an SIKM wiki might focus on how you can achieve the goals of KM (vs. the definition of what those goals are). I am not advocating that. I am just giving that as an example.

Andrew Gent
Knowledge Architect
Incredibly Dull





New poll for sikmleaders - Create a wiki page? #wikis #poll

sikmleaders@...
 

Enter your vote today! A new poll has been created for the
sikmleaders group:

We are looking at creating some KM content on a wiki page. Which approach would you want us to use?

Poll will be one week.

o Add any KM content we want to develop to wikipedia
o Create a new SIKM wiki page on a standalone free wiki service like Google sites.
o Wiki? What's a wiki?
o I wouldn't take the time to contribute even if you set one up so it doesn't really matter to me.


To vote, please visit the following web page:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/sikmleaders/surveys?id=2074920

Note: Please do not reply to this message. Poll votes are
not collected via email. To vote, you must go to the Yahoo! Groups
web site listed above.

Thanks!


Re: New member looking for new opportunities #jobs

Aronovitz@...
 

I'm also a new member who wishes he got involved much earlier. Anyway, I'd also like to check to see if any members have suggestions that might lead to opportunities (and I also thank Stan for his help thus far). I'm looking for a Sr Mgmt or Consulting role. I've recently led the creation of a "Knowledge Center" for Citigroup Private Bank's workforce that consisted of a powerful web site, a call center for complex needs as well as webcasts,  structured emails, and blogs to push knowledge to people. In addition we initated COPs as needed. Thanks....Art




Get fantasy football with free live scoring. Sign up for FanHouse Fantasy Football today.


Re: Xobni #tools

Yao Ge
 

Speaking from my few day's of experience with Xobni, it loads reasonable for me. One thing I did is to make Outlook runs on Cached Exchange Mode so that Xobni don't spend a lot of time wait for Exchange Server when it collect data from inbox.
 
I notice Xobni hits and misses on e-mail attachments that it discovers. Also its search is a little primitive in that it displays results sorted by date in stead of relevancy ranking and it does not support common full-text search features such as word stemming (searching "document aging" does not return e-mail with "document age").
 
Other than that, it is a great tool for taming e-mail overload.
 
-Yao


From: sikmleaders@... [mailto:sikmleaders@...] On Behalf Of Sathya Pandalai
Sent: Saturday, July 26, 2008 11:32 PM
To: sikmleaders@...
Subject: Re: [sikmleaders] Xobni


I have noticed that outlook takes a little more time to load with Xobni. Is it true with other users.

Sathya

--- On Tue, 7/22/08, Jack Vinson net> wrote:

From: Jack Vinson net>
Subject: Re: [sikmleaders] Xobni
To: sikmleaders@yahoogroups.com
Date: Tuesday, July 22, 2008, 7:14 PM

Cory-
 
I just discovered that it's possible to set which folders get indexed (when replying above).  Under options -> indexing, you can select which folders get indexed or not.  I've added my Deleted Items and removed the folder where I get email from our bug tracking system. 
 
I also note that while I think it is more cool than interesting, I am still using it.
 
Jack

On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 4:48 AM, Cory Banks <cory.banks@gmail. com> wrote:
I have been using it for a couple of months and the novelty hasn't worn off yet.

I will have to look if it possible to exclude folders or addresses as I have a number of popular group lists and RSS feeds appearing in the fray.

Thanks

Cory Banks

Profile: http://www.linkedin .com/in/corza/
Blog: http://corzandeffec t.blogspot. com/  


New member looking for new opportunities #jobs

vs_shenoy <vs_shenoy@...>
 

Hello,

New to the group, and I should say after reading so many emails and
listening to the recordings, I liken discovering SIKM to Hernan Cortes
discovering the Aztecs!! (sorry for the drama)

I am currently looking at new opportunities in KM, though I have had
very limited success. I am interested in Content Architecture,
Collaboration, and Content Sharing, and in particular discovering
Content and Knowledge Sharing models using business process modeling.
I have taken on primarily technical roles while working on Content
Management solutions using ASP.NET to Documentum for implementations
(in Higher Education and Pharmaceuticals). But now I am also looking
to learn and apply more social tools and process improvements (the
softer side) into technical solutions in my future pursuits.

I would be glad to hear from others in the group about opportunities
there may be in KM, or to even discuss ideas in work they are
currently doing. I'd also be happy with any advice you might have
about skills and approach for my search.

Thanks to Stan for pointing me to some opportunities already!!

I look forward to hearing from you all :)

Thanks,
Vinod


Re: Wiki #wikis

Arthur Shelley
 

Pete,



All good questions. Too many KM initiatives are launched without the end
benefits in mind.

In my case I have specific aims for the wikis the students build. In the
case of SIKM, we should defer to Michael (Fulton) who asked the initial
query why he thought it might be something worth pursuing. Benefits may be
as simple as providing a "safe" environment for SIKM members (those who have
no hands on experience with wikis can play to understand how they may apply
the tool for other purposes).



Another potential benefit is that we build a knowledgebase together so each
of us can browse and gain insights for our collective knowledge and
experiences (but is this already available through the many websites/on-line
resources on KM?). But then if we want to do this, why not on something
more open like Wikipedia..



As Dave stated, this may be better done in a more public forum and share the
maintenance load a little. I am happy to contribute regardless of purpose
as I believe there is value to students in a comprehensive site being
available for their reference.

Arthur Shelley
Author: The Organizational Zoo A Survival Guide to Workplace Behavior
<http://www.organizationalzoo.com> www.organizationalzoo.com

_____

From: sikmleaders@... [mailto:sikmleaders@...] On
Behalf Of noisedata
Sent: Sunday, 27 July 2008 8:28 AM
To: sikmleaders@...
Subject: Re: [sikmleaders] Re: Wiki



Well one think we need to ask ourselves is what do we need this for.
Otherwise it is just going to be another example of how not to implement a
piece of technology. Is there a problem that needs solving? Opportunity to
replace some of the rest of the stuff? Will the SIKM members be better off
with wiki (and how)? What is the goal of this? If we can provide answers
to this, i am sure the technological implementation is a piece of cake.



Pete

On Sat, Jul 26, 2008 at 10:37 AM, Arthur Shelley <arthur@organization
<mailto:arthur@...> alzoo.com> wrote:

I have been experimenting with wikis to facilitate collaborative behaviours
between my MBA students. They work together in their assignments to build
an on line knowledge encyclopedia. We are in the third iteration of this
and the stand of work has got better with each iteration. Just as I left
Cadbury last year we were also "playing" with wikis to build collective tome
of knowledge using internal experts from different parts of the world.



Certainly I would expect we could build a very interesting volume within
this community. The KM pages of Wikipedia are quite limited and could do
with some updating as well. Maybe there is a challenge for us. I will
contribute to our SIKM community next week.

Regards

Arthur Shelley
Author: The Organizational Zoo A Survival Guide to Workplace Behavior
<http://www.organizationalzoo.com/> www.organizationalzoo.com
Ph +61 413 047 408

_____

From: sikmleaders@ <mailto:sikmleaders@...> yahoogroups.com
[mailto:sikmleaders@ <mailto:sikmleaders@...> yahoogroups.com]
On Behalf Of Lee, Jim
Sent: Saturday, 26 July 2008 7:39 AM


To: sikmleaders@ <mailto:sikmleaders@...> yahoogroups.com
Subject: [sikmleaders] Re: Wiki



Thanks for the opportunity to weigh in. Interestingly, as Stan points out
the ability of any SIKM member to lead a wiki is independent of a host
source, such as APQC. A wiki is the perfect example of a true peer-to-peer
app, as well as being one of the most visible open source tools as well. So
while we use wikis within APQC, I think Stan's guidance here to start one
through the many sources available is the way to go. Good luck with it, and
I hope we'll be able to make useful contributions to it also.






Jim Lee, PMP

APQC

123 North Post Oak Lane

Houston, TX 77024

O: +1.713.893.7790 C: +1.216.338.3548

email: jlee@...

Yahoo, AOL, Skype IM: jimpmp2000

Windows Live Messenger: jimleesr@sbcglobal. <mailto:jimleesr@...>
net

text messaging: 2163383548@messagin
<mailto:2163383548@...> g.sprintpcs.com


Re: Wiki #wikis

David Snowden <snowded@...>
 

Of course there is another solution - contribute to the Wikipedia pages on Knowledge Management, Community of Practice etc.  At the moment only a very small number of us look after those pages and I seem to spend most of my time removing commercial promotion and vandalism.

That way the contribution would be to the wider community, of course it would then be subject to scrutiny by a wider group of editors and might be less comfortable in consequence.



Dave Snowden
Founder & Chief Scientific Officer
Cognitive Edge Pte Ltd

Now blogging at www.cognitive-edge.com


On 26 Jul 2008, at 09:37, Arthur Shelley wrote:


I have been experimenting with wikis to facilitate collaborative behaviours between my MBA students.  They work together in their assignments to build an on line knowledge encyclopedia.  We are in the third iteration of this and the stand of work has got better with each iteration.  Just as I left Cadbury last year we were also “playing” with wikis to build collective tome of knowledge using internal experts from different parts of the world.

 

Certainly I would expect we could build a very interesting volume within this community.  The KM pages of Wikipedia are quite limited and could do with some updating as well.  Maybe there is a challenge for us.  I will contribute to our SIKM community next week.

Regards

Arthur Shelley
Author: The Organizational Zoo A Survival Guide to Workplace Behavior
www.organizationalzoo.com 
Ph +61 413 047 408


From: sikmleaders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:sikmleaders@yahoogroups.com]On Behalf Of Lee, Jim
Sent: Saturday, 26 July 2008 7:39 AM
To: sikmleaders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [sikmleaders] Re: Wiki

 

Thanks for the opportunity to weigh in. Interestingly, as Stan points out the ability of any SIKM member to lead a wiki is independent of a host source, such as APQC. A wiki is the perfect example of a true peer-to-peer app, as well as being one of the most visible open source tools as well. So while we use wikis within APQC, I think Stan’s guidance here to start one through the many sources available is the way to go. Good luck with it, and I hope we’ll be able to make useful contributions to it also.

 

 

Jim Lee, PMP

APQC

123 North Post Oak Lane

Houston, TX 77024

O: +1.713.893.7790   C: +1.216.338.3548

email: jlee@...

Yahoo, AOL, Skype IM: jimpmp2000

Windows Live Messenger: jimleesr@sbcglobal.net

text messaging: 2163383548@messaging.sprintpcs.com

 

 




Re: Xobni #tools

Sathya Pandalai <spandalai@...>
 


I have noticed that outlook takes a little more time to load with Xobni. Is it true with other users.

Sathya


--- On Tue, 7/22/08, Jack Vinson wrote:
From: Jack Vinson
Subject: Re: [sikmleaders] Xobni
To: sikmleaders@...
Date: Tuesday, July 22, 2008, 7:14 PM

Cory-
 
I just discovered that it's possible to set which folders get indexed (when replying above).  Under options -> indexing, you can select which folders get indexed or not.  I've added my Deleted Items and removed the folder where I get email from our bug tracking system. 
 
I also note that while I think it is more cool than interesting, I am still using it.
 
Jack

On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 4:48 AM, Cory Banks <cory.banks@gmail. com> wrote:
I have been using it for a couple of months and the novelty hasn't worn off yet.

I will have to look if it possible to exclude folders or addresses as I have a number of popular group lists and RSS feeds appearing in the fray.

Thanks

Cory Banks

Profile: http://www.linkedin .com/in/corza/
Blog: http://corzandeffec t.blogspot. com/  


Re: Wiki #wikis

Peter Baloh
 


Re: Wiki #wikis

Arthur Shelley
 

I have been experimenting with wikis to facilitate collaborative behaviours between my MBA students.  They work together in their assignments to build an on line knowledge encyclopedia.  We are in the third iteration of this and the stand of work has got better with each iteration.  Just as I left Cadbury last year we were also “playing” with wikis to build collective tome of knowledge using internal experts from different parts of the world.

 

Certainly I would expect we could build a very interesting volume within this community.  The KM pages of Wikipedia are quite limited and could do with some updating as well.  Maybe there is a challenge for us.  I will contribute to our SIKM community next week.

Regards

Arthur Shelley
Author: The Organizational Zoo A Survival Guide to Workplace Behavior
www.organizationalzoo.com
Ph +61 413 047 408


From: sikmleaders@... [mailto:sikmleaders@...] On Behalf Of Lee, Jim
Sent: Saturday, 26 July 2008 7:39 AM
To: sikmleaders@...
Subject: [sikmleaders] Re: Wiki

 

Thanks for the opportunity to weigh in. Interestingly, as Stan points out the ability of any SIKM member to lead a wiki is independent of a host source, such as APQC. A wiki is the perfect example of a true peer-to-peer app, as well as being one of the most visible open source tools as well. So while we use wikis within APQC, I think Stan’s guidance here to start one through the many sources available is the way to go. Good luck with it, and I hope we’ll be able to make useful contributions to it also.

 

 

Jim Lee, PMP

APQC

123 North Post Oak Lane

Houston, TX 77024

O: +1.713.893.7790   C: +1.216.338.3548

email: jlee@...

Yahoo, AOL, Skype IM: jimpmp2000

Windows Live Messenger: jimleesr@sbcglobal.net

text messaging: 2163383548@messaging.sprintpcs.com

 

 


Re: Wiki #wikis

John D. Smith <john.smith@...>
 


 
John
*
* John D. Smith ~ Voice: 503.963.8229 ~ Skype: smithjd
* Portland, Oregon, USA  http://www.learningAlliances.net
* see http://technologyforcommunities.com/tools/
* “Please use your freedom to promote ours.” -- Aung San Suu Kyi


Re: Wiki #wikis

Yao Ge
 

hmm.... maybe invitation is required. I have invited your a few others. Let me know if that makes a different.
-Yao


From: sikmleaders@... [mailto:sikmleaders@...] On Behalf Of Mark D Neff
Sent: Friday, July 25, 2008 6:17 PM
To: sikmleaders@...
Subject: [sikmleaders] Edit function?


Just went to the site. It is not clear how to edit the page or even if I can. If it is open then we should all be able to edit it.

Mark




"Ge, Yao (Y.)"
Sent by: sikmleaders@yahoogroups.com

07/25/2008 06:01 PM

Please respond to
sikmleaders@yahoogroups.com

To
yahoogroups.com>
cc
Subject
RE: [sikmleaders] Re: Wiki





I justed created one, it currently open to public.
http://sites.google.com/site/midwestkm/
-Yao


From: sikmleaders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:sikmleaders@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Lee, Jim
Sent:
Friday, July 25, 2008 5:39 PM
To:
sikmleaders@yahoogroups.com
Subject:
[sikmleaders] Re: Wiki

Thanks for the opportunity to weigh in. Interestingly, as Stan points out the ability of any SIKM member to lead a wiki is independent of a host source, such as APQC. A wiki is the perfect example of a true peer-to-peer app, as well as being one of the most visible open source tools as well. So while we use wikis within APQC, I think Stan’s guidance here to start one through the many sources available is the way to go. Good luck with it, and I hope we’ll be able to make useful contributions to it also.

Jim Lee, PMP

APQC

123 North Post Oak Lane

Houston, TX 77024

O: +1.713.893.7790   C: +1.216.338.3548

email: jlee@...

Yahoo, AOL, Skype IM: jimpmp2000

Windows Live Messenger: jimleesr@sbcglobal.net

text messaging: 2163383548@messaging.sprintpcs.com



Wiki #wikis

Mark D Neff <mneff@...>
 


Just went to the site. It is not clear how to edit the page or even if I can. If it is open then we should all be able to edit it.

Mark




"Ge, Yao (Y.)" <yge@...>
Sent by: sikmleaders@...

07/25/2008 06:01 PM

Please respond to
sikmleaders@...

To
<sikmleaders@...>
cc
Subject
RE: [sikmleaders] Re: Wiki





I justed created one, it currently open to public.
http://sites.google.com/site/midwestkm/
-Yao


From: sikmleaders@... [mailto:sikmleaders@...] On Behalf Of Lee, Jim
Sent:
Friday, July 25, 2008 5:39 PM
To:
sikmleaders@...
Subject:
[sikmleaders] Re: Wiki

Thanks for the opportunity to weigh in. Interestingly, as Stan points out the ability of any SIKM member to lead a wiki is independent of a host source, such as APQC. A wiki is the perfect example of a true peer-to-peer app, as well as being one of the most visible open source tools as well. So while we use wikis within APQC, I think Stan’s guidance here to start one through the many sources available is the way to go. Good luck with it, and I hope we’ll be able to make useful contributions to it also.

Jim Lee, PMP

APQC

123 North Post Oak Lane

Houston, TX 77024

O: +1.713.893.7790   C: +1.216.338.3548

email: jlee@...

Yahoo, AOL, Skype IM: jimpmp2000

Windows Live Messenger: jimleesr@...

text messaging: 2163383548@...



Re: Wiki #wikis

Yao Ge
 

I justed created one, it currently open to public.
-Yao


From: sikmleaders@... [mailto:sikmleaders@...] On Behalf Of Lee, Jim
Sent: Friday, July 25, 2008 5:39 PM
To: sikmleaders@...
Subject: [sikmleaders] Re: Wiki

Thanks for the opportunity to weigh in. Interestingly, as Stan points out the ability of any SIKM member to lead a wiki is independent of a host source, such as APQC. A wiki is the perfect example of a true peer-to-peer app, as well as being one of the most visible open source tools as well. So while we use wikis within APQC, I think Stan’s guidance here to start one through the many sources available is the way to go. Good luck with it, and I hope we’ll be able to make useful contributions to it also.

Jim Lee, PMP

APQC

123 North Post Oak Lane

Houston, TX 77024

O: +1.713.893.7790   C: +1.216.338.3548

email: jlee@...

Yahoo, AOL, Skype IM: jimpmp2000

Windows Live Messenger: jimleesr@sbcglobal.net

text messaging: 2163383548@messaging.sprintpcs.com

9181 - 9200 of 10149