Oky Doky Just to get something going, I set up a page on Wikispaces. It seemsmore intuitive than Wikidot.com (which also has firewall issues). On firstglance, It doesn't seem as powerful as Google

Alet al, Wikispacesseems easy enough and is also free. Thereare also some good basic wiki “video tutorials” (just a few minuteseach on how to set everything up). Italso has the useful free

Hello, This email message is a notification to let you know that a file has been uploaded to the Files area of the sikmleaders group. File : /Knowledge Transfer Services.pdf Uploaded by

Al, Share your article on KM Services. Thatsounds perfect for our new wiki. Mark "Albert Simard" Sent by: sikmleaders@... 07/28/2008 10:06 AM Please respond to sikmleaders@... To cc SubjectRe:

One of the learningactivities we've got going in CPsquare is to look at the community &practice issues involved in being a Wikepedia editor AND a member of a communitythat's visible in Wikipedia. So:

Nope - This is a group site; not a wiki. Al

Martin - The one thing I've found with automated e-mails for wiki changes is thatone can easily get 30 to 50 messages per day if a site has much activity atall. It is good for group sites, because

Reply to Yao - The big thing that we don't have nor is a capacity for peerproduction of a common document, such as criteria and indicators for lifecycle management of knowledge. I totally agree

A few thoughts. In my experience, Wikipedia is a place for finished articles, even ifthey're small. At least to the point that they can survive the assortedbots and reviews while others enhance

OK I have put it under watch and note it has the buzzword tag Dave Snowden Founder & Chief Scientific Officer Cognitive Edge Pte Ltd Now blogging at www.cognitive-edge.com

correction - I meant to say "Wikipedia is NOT suited for discussion and exchange of view points". closed this join the summarizing can Knol). We current in views. definiting

Dave - Actually, I edited the original article (there was one legitimatelyproblematic paragraph) and then recast as a sub-heading under knowledgemarkets. I'm happy to note that both have lasted

Perhaps the SIKM wiki could start off as 1) a place to articulate and refine the purpose of the group and 2) a Capture and Reorganization tool for the mailing list. 1) A wiki is a good place to

Well I've been editing it on KM related pages for two years now and haven't seen that. Also avant guarde is not a criteria for deletion. I you put something there it has to be supported but

Dave - Been there; done that. I've posted or contributed to about a dozenKM-related Wikipedia articles (although not all that much in the pastwhile. I've even had the joy of having an article on

I think one of the draw back of Yahoo Group is it isrelatively closed participation in discussion. IMHO, we should have a teamblogging environment that each member can post topics of interest or ask

I agree wholeheartedly with Andrew (and Dave). I had the samefeeling as he did with the mention of the wiki. Contributing to Wikipedia hasbeen problematic for many of us, I think, for various

>> A new poll has been created for the sikmleaders group: Hmm... unfortunately this poll doesn't really allow me to answer the question accurately. It is not a question of either/or. Yes, I think we