Other

#poll

Dennis L. Thomas IQStrategix (810) 662-5199 DLThomas@... IQStrategix.com Leveraging Organizational Knowledge

#poll

A poll has been updated: What’s your favorite color? (All responses will be kept anonymous). 1. Red 2. Yellow 3. Green 4. Blue 5. Other Vote Now

#poll

I have used WikiSpaces and admire its simplicity. Peter Dorfman On Tue Jul 29 10:59 , "Albert Simard" sent:

#wikis #poll

The following sikmleaders poll is now closed. Here are the final results: POLL QUESTION: We are looking at creating some KM content on a wiki page. Which approach would you want us to use? Poll will b

#wikis #poll

Oky Doky Just to get something going, I set up a page on Wikispaces. It seems more intuitive than Wikidot.com (which also has firewall issues). On first glance, It doesn't seem as powerful as Google w

#wikis #poll

#wikis #poll

Al et al, Wikispaces seems easy enough and is also free. There are also some good basic wiki “video tutorials” (just a few minutes each on how to set everything up). It also has the useful free additi

#wikis #poll

Reply to Yao - The big thing that we don't have nor is a capacity for peer production of a common document, such as criteria and indicators for life cycle management of knowledge. I totally agree that

#wikis #poll

A few thoughts. In my experience, Wikipedia is a place for finished articles, even if they're small. At least to the point that they can survive the assorted bots and reviews while others enhance them

#wikis #poll

correction - I meant to say "Wikipedia is NOT suited for discussion and exchange of view points". closed this join the summarizing can Knol). We current in views. definiting SIKM one [mailto:sikmleade

#wikis #poll

I think one of the draw back of Yahoo Group is it is relatively closed participation in discussion. IMHO, we should have a team blogging environment that each member can post topics of interest or ask

#wikis #poll

I agree wholeheartedly with Andrew (and Dave). I had the same feeling as he did with the mention of the wiki. Contributing to Wikipedia has been problematic for many of us, I think, for various reason

#wikis #poll

>> A new poll has been created for the sikmleaders group: Hmm... unfortunately this poll doesn't really allow me to answer the question accurately. It is not a question of either/or. Yes, I think we s

#wikis #poll

Enter your vote today! A new poll has been created for the sikmleaders group: We are looking at creating some KM content on a wiki page. Which approach would you want us to use? Poll will be one week.

#wikis #poll

To find out who initiated a poll, click on "Polls" in the left menu of the Yahoo! Group site, which takes you to http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/sikmleaders/polls . There you will see the creators

#wikis #poll

I fully endorse this comment. It is one of the major problems with surveys. The responses are limited to the range of hypotheses envisaged by the researcher and as a result (i) false conclusions are d

#wikis #poll

I agree with Andrew... the Wiki system is emergent and appears to be working well... and the "action nodes" in groups are consistently in the minority as he explains. Most people are lurkers[readers o

#wikis #poll

>> A new poll has been created for the sikmleaders group [...] it appears that most of Wikipedia editing is done by a very small group of people. Why do you think this is? Why don't more people take a

#wikis #poll

Enter your vote today! A new poll has been created for the sikmleaders group: Based on the statistics at http://stats.wikimedia.org/EN/TablesWikipediaEN.htm#wikipedians, it appears that most of Wikipe

#wikis #poll