New poll for sikmleaders: Definition of KM #poll #definition
Enter your vote today! A new poll has been created for the
Would the field of KM (knowledge management) benefit from having a generally accepted definition of what it (KM) is and the benefits it aims to bring about?
o Yes - a common definition would be helpful
o No - I don't think a common definition is needed
o I don't really care - I have my own definition and that's all I need to be successful with my clients
o Maybe - depends on the circumstance.
To vote, please visit the following web page:
Note: Please do not reply to this message. Poll votes are
not collected via email. To vote, you must go to the Yahoo! Groups
web site listed above.
Gent, Andrew <andrew.gent@...>
>>A new poll has been created for the sikmleaders group:
A poll is an interesting idea. But I see two difficulties with this particular poll:
1. The wording of the responses has a particular bias to it. The two key answers are Yes or No. but the poll is more directive and I cannot agree with either answer. If I had a choice, my answer would be "No - it is not possible to create a meaningful and generally-accepted definition of KM". "Not possible" is distinctly different from the poll answer that says one isn't "needed"...
2. Polls can tell you if there is a majority (or plurality), but almost never tell you that there is a consensus. And Dave Snowden's recent postings indicate that a consensus doesn't exist. So polling for a "generally accepted" definition is problematic....
Tom Short <tom.short@...>
Not sure what "possibility" has to do with it - that was not the
question. The question is: would a definition be useful?
Analagously, we could also ask, "Would room-temperature fusion be
useful?" Answering "yes" does not commit one to believing in its
possibility, merely in its utility.
Concensus? Undoubtably not. Level of energy within the group to
pursue something? We shall see.
--- In email@example.com, "Gent, Andrew" <andrew.gent@...>
key answers are Yes or No. but the poll is more directive and Icannot
agree with either answer. If I had a choice, my answer wouldbe "No - it
is not possible to create a meaningful and generally-accepteddefinition
of KM". "Not possible" is distinctly different from the poll answerthat
says one isn't "needed"...almost
never tell you that there is a consensus. And Dave Snowden's recent