Value KPIs, statistics, facts on loss or gains associated with poor or great metadata mining #value #metrics #metadata


Aprill Allen <aprill@...>
 

David, this thread is asking a different question, hence Minu splitting it off. I can see a number of responses, already, to the first question offering suggestions for tools that do automated volume tagging etc.

Does anyone have any pointers to research on metadata mining?


cheers,
Aprill


--

Aprill Allen
Founder and Managing Director | Knowledge Bird
KM Consulting & KCS Training
M: +61 (0)400 101 961
knowledgebird.com


David Eddy
 

Minu -

>
Please share any studies, surveys, articles, reports, on KPIs, stats or facts on loss or gains associated
>  with poor or great Metadata mining.
>

It would be useful if you would CLEARLY state what your situation is & what you think you need.

Regurgitating marketing bafflegab & jargon is not useful.

“Millions of documents” says nothing.  Last I looked, I have 2M+ documents on this desktop computer.

Please share with us what you consider to be “metadata.”  What is NOT metadata.


On May 1st I asked:

Three questions:

1/ - what do you consider to be (or not) a "document?"

2/- what is [your] technical environment(s)?

3/ - how big (employees) is the organization & how old is it?


- David


Minu Mittal
 

Please share any studies, surveys, articles, reports, on KPIs, stats or facts on loss or gains associated with poor or great Metadata mining. (overall KM also welcome)
As a follow-up to the earlier post on Technology/Tool to capture metadata across multiple repositories with millions of documents