KM and Mental Health #discussion-starter
Matt Moore <matt@...>
Hi,
Following on form the #postyourpill campaign: https://www.bigissue.com/life/health/postyourpill-trend-mental-health-medication/ I want to raise the issue of mental health and KM. When we work with knowledge we almost always work with people. My questions are: - Can our work surface mental health issues (e.g. burn out) in those we work with? If so, how do we handle those? (given that most of us are not trained mental health professionals) - How do we protect our own mental health in the work that we do? - I suspect there are trained mental health professionals on these lists so I welcome your input. But anyone is welcome to comment. My mental health issues are touched on here: https://www.linkedin.com/posts/mattbmoore_postyourpill-activity-6872621551553007616-8VFb If people want to post anonymously then feel free to email me and I will forward on your behalf with all identifying info removed. I absolutely guarantee confidentiality. Altho please note, I am not a trained mental health professional. Regards, Matt Moore +61 423 784 504
|
|
Hello, In case this helps, where I work, we created an Employee Network without really knowing it was some kind of KM. It was a space that allowed colleagues to be their whole selves at the workplace. Since we all had families issues, emotional issues, physical issues, and also common interests like music, sports, art, giving back to the local community and the environment, we figured the knowledge we could all potentially share, especially our contacts or personal learning, could help those with issues that directly or indirectly affect their work (and don‘t even realize it). Music, for example, is a universal language that everyone understands and can feel connected with. We created our own choir and who regularly meet just to connect with their music (no hierarchy there) get a breather from their daily work. A good example that also works is our network of colleagues who have family member with special needs esp. mental health issues. The good thing about making KM even more « official » in the organization is that people in this group felt even more courageous to come together and share information on doctors, best stress-management practices, traumatic experiences and just to be there for others. Since COVID, the Employee Networks also started organizing webinars with medical professionals, clinical psychologists, specific coaches just to talk about things you don't usually talk about in the workplace - handling grief, anxiety, being a caregiver for your family, too much "drama" in the workplace or in life. We also used in-house resources by asking staff with special skills like yoga, meditation and qigong to give weekly virtual classes for free. And they were more than happy to share their private skills. Creating a supporting culture was very helpful for my colleagues to start being kinder to each other and especially for building trust, thus making it easier to share information or simply just to ask a work-related question to someone you know only by name. Hope this helps. best, Ninez Piezas-Jerbi World Trade Organization, Geneva
On Sat, Dec 4, 2021 at 12:26 AM Matt Moore <matt@...> wrote:
|
|
Nick Milton
In reply to Matt's comment; when I was an active knowledge manager and facilitating lots of Retrospect meetings, I often felt I was playing the role of unlicensed and unofficial therapist. In a good no-blame non-judgmental "safe space" meeting, people can discuss the undiscussables and talk about (for example) project failures that otherwise could have been swept under the carpet. Although the purpose of such a meeting is to uncover knowledge, it has a side benefit of helping with closure.
I remember once sitting in the departure bay of an offshore platform waiting for the helicopter back to shore after a series of such meetings, and a chap came up to me and said "I just want to say thanks, mate, for listening to us". I felt quite touched.
It's good to talk, and a lot of KM is talking, and (more importantly) listening. Like the boilermaker said after one AAR; "you know, before this nobody had ever asked me what I thought"
I am not at all a mental health professional and have no such training, so much of this may be naive, but any of us can ask and listen, and this is a behaviour which KM promotes and facilitates.
Nick Milton www.linkedin.com/company/knoco-ltd email nick.milton@... blog www.nickmilton.com twitter @nickknoco Author of the recent book - "The Knowledge Manager’s Handbook" – one of the 100 best management books of all time
"Ambition without knowledge is like a boat on dry land."
From: main@SIKM.groups.io <main@SIKM.groups.io> On Behalf Of Matt Moore
Sent: 03 December 2021 23:26 To: SIKM@groups.io; km4dev@... Subject: [SIKM] KM and Mental Health
Hi,
Following on form the #postyourpill campaign: https://www.bigissue.com/life/health/postyourpill-trend-mental-health-medication/
I want to raise the issue of mental health and KM.
When we work with knowledge we almost always work with people. My questions are:
- Can our work surface mental health issues (e.g. burn out) in those we work with? If so, how do we handle those? (given that most of us are not trained mental health professionals)
- How do we protect our own mental health in the work that we do?
- I suspect there are trained mental health professionals on these lists so I welcome your input. But anyone is welcome to comment.
My mental health issues are touched on here: https://www.linkedin.com/posts/mattbmoore_postyourpill-activity-6872621551553007616-8VFb
If people want to post anonymously then feel free to email me and I will forward on your behalf with all identifying info removed. I absolutely guarantee confidentiality. Altho please note, I am not a trained mental health professional.
Regards,
Matt Moore +61 423 784 504
|
|
John Carney
Interesting juxtaposition in the title of this blog so I thought I’d post from my own experience recently leading KM in a U.K. Government Department - I am now back working on my other love Science Futures and just a part of that change is mental health related Negatives The feeling of banging ones head against a wall in hoping to inculcate organisational change - important to set realistic personal expectations and not forget emotional resilience The deep frustration that folk cite on a daily basis of not being able to find information to do their jobs Positives We have very active on line Forums supported by management that deal separately with mental health and neurodiversity My recent work on leading Communities as part of the KM agenda - I am told it has brought a sense of social integration and our on line Forums as a whole are useful for this (but a slight negative again is that conversations can sometimes be diverted into negative territory) Let’s not forget the role of the pandemic here which I think dominates more than the pros and cons of KM Happy Xmas / holidays / Mental Health to you all John
On 4 Dec 2021, at 09:32, Nick Milton <nick.milton@...> wrote:
|
|
Patrick Lambe
[Two separate messages below, sent to KM4Dev - Stan invited me to repost here, very lightly edited]
Patrick Lambe
Partner Straits Knowledge phone: +65 98528511 web: www.straitsknowledge.com resources: www.greenchameleon.com knowledge mapping: www.aithinsoftware.com
|
|
There is a parallel thread in KM4Dev.
|
|
I am feeling very hesitant to share my thoughts about this subject here because I feel there is a lot of nuance to how I'm thinking about this, and I'm not sure I'll be successful in conveying that nuance in this written response - but I'll give it a shot. As a result, I ended up working with a psychotherapist that my mentor and others in our firm had been using. This psychotherapist and my experience working with her was fantastic. I uncovered a bunch of "junk" in my own closet that had been getting my way throughout my life up to that point. So do I think it's important to take care of oneself in whatever way makes sense, and take advantage of all available tools to do so? Absolutely. Do I think there's value in sharing this with work colleagues who otherwise have no need to know that I'm doing it? No, I do not. This is where the nuance part comes in. On the one hand, I think it's important for companies to make mental health resources available to their employees, and for the most part, I have not seen a company-sponsored health plan that did not include mental health and counseling services in the standard coverage options. I do think it's up to the individual to take responsibility for their own mental health. And perhaps it's up to managers to be good listeners, and upon hearing that an employee is going through a rough period, to ask them if they are aware of the available resources offered by the company. But as for volunteering that information in the workplace - the mental health issues they're experiencing, or the resources they're availing themselves of - it feels to me somehow inappropriate or unprofessional in a work setting. I accept that maybe I'm operating out of an old paradigm and things have changed a lot in the last decade. So is taking care of one's mental health critical? Absolutely. No doubt about it. I'm just not sure about the degree to which sharing that around the workplace is necessary or particularly helpful. Tom Short Consulting All of my previous SIKM Posts
|
|
Matt Moore <matt@...>
Hi,
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
Very interesting discussion. Many thanks to everyone who has contributed. I am deliberately not contributing to the discussion on microaggressions - because if I get stuck into it I may never get out. I am however going to respond to some of Tom's comments - and I want to thank Tom for giving me the opportunity to do so. "But as for volunteering that information in the workplace - the mental health issues they're experiencing, or the resources they're availing themselves of - it feels to me somehow inappropriate or unprofessional in a work setting. I accept that maybe I'm operating out of an old paradigm and things have changed a lot in the last decade. So is taking care of one's mental health critical? Absolutely. No doubt about it. I'm just not sure about the degree to which sharing that around the workplace is necessary or particularly helpful." So I think it is important that we frame "appropriate disclosure". And let me relate it to my own experiences and decisions with bipolar disorder. I was actually talking to a friend today who has severe anxiety and who has made a similar set of disclosure decisions. I do not start every meeting with "hey, it's bipolar dude here". 1. It's rarely pertinent to the matter at hand and 2. I don't want to be "bipolar guy" - there's so much more to me than that. However if someone says "you seem to be highly energetic today" or "you seem to be really down / quiet today" then I am going to share the cause of that and move on. If they want to ask questions then I have no reluctance to answer but neither do I expect people to be deeply interested in my mental health. There is a discourse around "bringing your whole self to work". Now I don't believe we should bring our whole selves to work - in the same way that we should not bring our naked bodies to work (unless we work in specific industries). But if we are something more than interchangeable Generic Business People (TM), then we will bring our quirks and eccentricities. We will bring our strengths and our weaknesses. And it will be messy. There is a related point about leadership. As a leader and someone with mental health issues, I feel it is a responsibility to model appropriate disclosure and to respond openly when people disclose to me. I am not willing to hide who I am nor will I ask others to do that for my convenience. Because if we can disclose and discuss then we have a better chance of managing. With my anxious friend, he has discussed his anxiety with his boss. He was concerned that his boss would think that he was flaky. His boss said: "No, the fact that you can hold it together as well as you do with everything going on inside is inspiring". Regards, Matt
On Tue, Dec 7, 2021 at 7:41 AM Tom Short <tshortconsulting@...> wrote:
--
Matt Moore M. +61 (0) 423 784 504 matt@...
|
|
Robert L. Bogue
Can you explain the distinction you're making about not bringing our whole selves to work? You provide an analogy then explain we should bring our quirks... I'm trying to better understand what you're saying.
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
------------------- Robert L. Bogue O: (317) 844-5310 M: (317) 506-4977 Blog: http://www.thorprojects.com/blog Want to be confident about your change management efforts? https://ConfidentChangeManagement.com Are you burned out? https://ExtinguishBurnout.com can help you get out of it (for free)
-----Original Message-----
From: main@SIKM.groups.io <main@SIKM.groups.io> On Behalf Of Matt Moore via groups.io Sent: Tuesday, December 7, 2021 6:36 AM To: main@sikm.groups.io Subject: Re: [SIKM] KM and Mental Health #discussion-starter Hi, Very interesting discussion. Many thanks to everyone who has contributed. I am deliberately not contributing to the discussion on microaggressions - because if I get stuck into it I may never get out. I am however going to respond to some of Tom's comments - and I want to thank Tom for giving me the opportunity to do so. "But as for volunteering that information in the workplace - the mental health issues they're experiencing, or the resources they're availing themselves of - it feels to me somehow inappropriate or unprofessional in a work setting. I accept that maybe I'm operating out of an old paradigm and things have changed a lot in the last decade. So is taking care of one's mental health critical? Absolutely. No doubt about it. I'm just not sure about the degree to which sharing that around the workplace is necessary or particularly helpful." So I think it is important that we frame "appropriate disclosure". And let me relate it to my own experiences and decisions with bipolar disorder. I was actually talking to a friend today who has severe anxiety and who has made a similar set of disclosure decisions. I do not start every meeting with "hey, it's bipolar dude here". 1. It's rarely pertinent to the matter at hand and 2. I don't want to be "bipolar guy" - there's so much more to me than that. However if someone says "you seem to be highly energetic today" or "you seem to be really down / quiet today" then I am going to share the cause of that and move on. If they want to ask questions then I have no reluctance to answer but neither do I expect people to be deeply interested in my mental health. There is a discourse around "bringing your whole self to work". Now I don't believe we should bring our whole selves to work - in the same way that we should not bring our naked bodies to work (unless we work in specific industries). But if we are something more than interchangeable Generic Business People (TM), then we will bring our quirks and eccentricities. We will bring our strengths and our weaknesses. And it will be messy. There is a related point about leadership. As a leader and someone with mental health issues, I feel it is a responsibility to model appropriate disclosure and to respond openly when people disclose to me. I am not willing to hide who I am nor will I ask others to do that for my convenience. Because if we can disclose and discuss then we have a better chance of managing. With my anxious friend, he has discussed his anxiety with his boss. He was concerned that his boss would think that he was flaky. His boss said: "No, the fact that you can hold it together as well as you do with everything going on inside is inspiring". Regards, Matt On Tue, Dec 7, 2021 at 7:41 AM Tom Short <tshortconsulting@...> wrote:
-- Matt Moore M. +61 (0) 423 784 504 matt@...
|
|
Nowadays I find I hear the term 'mental health' used in different ways. Used to describe mental illness, sickness and conditions. Plus in recent years used to refer also to any kind of negative feelings - being stressed and so on. And I think the two are pretty different. That doesn't mean stress isn't important: Left to become strain it's a major killer.
I liked Nick's comment about the therapeutic effect of being listened to/heard; doing a retrospect and I think that's right; and it goes to the second kind of 'mental health' issues. As I think does what John noted about (my paraphrase) the frictions one encounters w/o KM. And like Ninez and John I have the same experience, as leader of communities, of enabling the community mechanism for different groups concerned about various issues, some of which may have been mental health-related. It's not the first focus of KM but the mechanism we have in communities can contribute positively. That might go a bit more towards supporting mental illness, sickness and conditions. So they're two obvious areas. So now I question myself that, if "knowledge management" is conceived as a new kind of management better fit for the knowledge era, what then would be different about how it addresses mental health than the incumbent, orthodox management? I think it's this: The incumbent form of management is very 'external' in focus. It manages for the visible and material. It focuses on inputs, tasks, outputs and so on. A knowledge management should also address the 'internal' world which is personal as much as anything. We would recognise and accommodate the true nature of humans which is different to machines and processes.
|
|
Matt Moore <matt@...>
Robert B, thank you for the question.
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
"Can you explain the distinction you're making about not bringing our whole selves to work? You provide an analogy then explain we should bring our quirks... I'm trying to better understand what you're saying." I don't think we should bring our "whole selves" to work. I think that exhortation is made by those who may have a poor understanding of what the "whole self" is. I do not think full disclosure of one's condition is wise. I do not think it is safe to disclose anything in some environments - because it will be used against you. "We want you to bring your whole selves to work" "Thanks. Just to share something with the team, it wasn't until I listened to Josh Wink's Higher States of Consciousness that I realised that R2D2 was actually a radical lesbian" "Not you, Matt, we want you to keep your whole self the **** away from us" However I also think that old models of professionalism demanded that we suppress anything of ourselves not explicitly authorised by the organisation. I do not think this is healthy, productive or just. I think that if you claim to want an organisation that is any of these things then you have to change. As I stated before, you need to discuss mental health issues to manage them effectively. So I am arguing for appropriate disclosure. Which requires judgment. And what is "appropriate" will vary from person to person, organisation to organisation, and relationship to relationship. And these definitions of "appropriate" will change over time as well as across space. No wonder we all feel a bit uncomfortable. It is only in the last few years that we have begun to discuss these things openly. We are at the start of this process. When I grew up in the 80s, I literally had no language to discuss any of this stuff - and nor did my family. And these conditions are *incredibly* common - with estimates of as high as 20% of the population having a diagnosable condition at any one time (the validity of our current diagnostic frameworks is a worthy topic of conversation but I'm not going in to it here). Does that make sense and answer the question? Or is there something here that I am not explaining? (I genuinely want to articulate my position as clearly as possible) Regards, Matt
On Tue, Dec 7, 2021 at 11:53 PM Robert L. Bogue <rbogue@...> wrote:
--
Matt Moore M. +61 (0) 423 784 504 matt@...
|
|
Robert L. Bogue
Totally makes sense. Thanks.
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
I think the key point you're making (check my understanding) is that many people bring your whole self to work is used as an excuse for over disclosure and that appropriate disclosure is key. I agree. When we work with addicts we're careful to help them discover the line. You see, there's an often quoted quip "You're only as sick as your secrets" which implies you shouldn't have any. However, there's also over disclosure and verbal vomiting. While it can feel good at the time, it's harmful to the person who is doing it and sometimes to the person receiving it. Most frequently we ask people whether people have earned the right to know your truth. That seems to be helpful to some -- but obviously not all. I think that whole self doesn't mean uncensored. It means that you're not too afraid to share the important things -- when the time is right. Of course, it's all judgement and will be wrong but the safety for that as well can be healthy. You raise an important aspect about how to know what things others have earned the right to know (about your personal experience.) In the KM4Dev parallel discussion I disclosed that my son died by suicide. I did that with only two sentences of clarification. (He wasn't generally suicidal and he had lost a very close friend.) I did that because I felt safe enough to share. I know that some will think that I'm a bad father because only bad fathers have sons that kill themselves. (Which is untrue) However, I made the decision to share because the greater good was worth the disclosure. (As it is here.) I don't tell everyone that Alex died by suicide -- nor do I hide it. I just recognize that some people aren't worthy of the information -- or that they'll be harmed by it. It's hard decisions to make and ones that we all error on from time-to-time but the more we're willing to step (carefully) into the hard parts of our lives the more powerful we all collectively become. Rob ------------------- Robert L. Bogue O: (317) 844-5310 M: (317) 506-4977 Blog: http://www.thorprojects.com/blog Want to be confident about your change management efforts? https://ConfidentChangeManagement.com Are you burned out? https://ExtinguishBurnout.com can help you get out of it (for free)
-----Original Message-----
From: main@SIKM.groups.io <main@SIKM.groups.io> On Behalf Of Matt Moore via groups.io Sent: Tuesday, December 7, 2021 8:37 AM To: main@SIKM.groups.io Subject: Re: [SIKM] KM and Mental Health #discussion-starter Robert B, thank you for the question. "Can you explain the distinction you're making about not bringing our whole selves to work? You provide an analogy then explain we should bring our quirks... I'm trying to better understand what you're saying." I don't think we should bring our "whole selves" to work. I think that exhortation is made by those who may have a poor understanding of what the "whole self" is. I do not think full disclosure of one's condition is wise. I do not think it is safe to disclose anything in some environments - because it will be used against you. "We want you to bring your whole selves to work" "Thanks. Just to share something with the team, it wasn't until I listened to Josh Wink's Higher States of Consciousness that I realised that R2D2 was actually a radical lesbian" "Not you, Matt, we want you to keep your whole self the **** away from us" However I also think that old models of professionalism demanded that we suppress anything of ourselves not explicitly authorised by the organisation. I do not think this is healthy, productive or just. I think that if you claim to want an organisation that is any of these things then you have to change. As I stated before, you need to discuss mental health issues to manage them effectively. So I am arguing for appropriate disclosure. Which requires judgment. And what is "appropriate" will vary from person to person, organisation to organisation, and relationship to relationship. And these definitions of "appropriate" will change over time as well as across space. No wonder we all feel a bit uncomfortable. It is only in the last few years that we have begun to discuss these things openly. We are at the start of this process. When I grew up in the 80s, I literally had no language to discuss any of this stuff - and nor did my family. And these conditions are *incredibly* common - with estimates of as high as 20% of the population having a diagnosable condition at any one time (the validity of our current diagnostic frameworks is a worthy topic of conversation but I'm not going in to it here). Does that make sense and answer the question? Or is there something here that I am not explaining? (I genuinely want to articulate my position as clearly as possible) Regards, Matt On Tue, Dec 7, 2021 at 11:53 PM Robert L. Bogue <rbogue@...> wrote:
-- Matt Moore M. +61 (0) 423 784 504 matt@...
|
|